v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "40d Talk:Bar"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
this really deserves its own page | this really deserves its own page | ||
This (now stub) article used to redirect to [[metal]]. Isn't bar:metal like quiver:bolt, something that goes hand in hand. What does a separate article give that the discussion on metal did not, and more? A discussion of one is a discussion of them both - same article, neh? For charcoal/coke, a quick line of clarification is sufficient. Is there enough here for its own article? --[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 17:50, 16 September 2009 (UTC) | This (now stub) article used to redirect to [[metal]]. Isn't bar:metal like quiver:bolt, something that goes hand in hand. What does a separate article give that the discussion on metal did not, and more? A discussion of one is a discussion of them both - same article, neh? For charcoal/coke, a quick line of clarification is sufficient. Is there enough here for its own article? --[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 17:50, 16 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | :I personally found it rather confusing that when coal, ash, potash, pearlash, and soap refer to the fact that they come in bars, they redirected to [[metal]], which (rightly) makes absolutely no mention of other materials that come in bars. In other words, a stub article is better than no article at all. --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 17:55, 16 September 2009 (UTC) | |
Revision as of 17:57, 16 September 2009
Own article vs redirect
this really deserves its own page
This (now stub) article used to redirect to metal. Isn't bar:metal like quiver:bolt, something that goes hand in hand. What does a separate article give that the discussion on metal did not, and more? A discussion of one is a discussion of them both - same article, neh? For charcoal/coke, a quick line of clarification is sufficient. Is there enough here for its own article? --Albedo 17:50, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- I personally found it rather confusing that when coal, ash, potash, pearlash, and soap refer to the fact that they come in bars, they redirected to metal, which (rightly) makes absolutely no mention of other materials that come in bars. In other words, a stub article is better than no article at all. --Quietust 17:55, 16 September 2009 (UTC)