v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "40d Talk:Remove"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (moved Talk:Remove to 40d Talk:Remove: namespace migration) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
There's also a distinct lack of links to here. [[User:Oddtwang of Dork|Oddtwang of Dork]] 12:18, 29 March 2010 (UTC) | There's also a distinct lack of links to here. [[User:Oddtwang of Dork|Oddtwang of Dork]] 12:18, 29 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
:I'd say it probably does belong in 40d, if only because much (but not all) of it does not apply to the old 2D version, and there will probably be some other things in the next version that'll go in this list (such as removing burrows). --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 12:48, 29 March 2010 (UTC) | :I'd say it probably does belong in 40d, if only because much (but not all) of it does not apply to the old 2D version, and there will probably be some other things in the next version that'll go in this list (such as removing burrows). --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 12:48, 29 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Good question - I think maybe we hold off, take a "wait and see" approach? Imo too many changes are being made based on blanket assumptions - there will be a LOT of clean up necessary after the actual facts are known, and this may be one of them. (Seems I created this page on March 2 '10, which iirc is before we heard of an April release date and while the 40d migration was still underway.) Otoh, moving this to 40d makes as at least much sense as some of the other moves, and probably more. --[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 16:49, 29 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::So... 10 days have passed. Feel any more confident about what to do with this yet? I say 40d it, then maybe create a 2010 copy. Especially since removing zones is a bit different now. --[[User:Eagle0600|Eagle0600]] 10:57, 8 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 08:25, 11 April 2010
Should this not be part of the 40d namespace? Mostly unlikely to change, but that's true of a lot of pages in the namespace. There's also a distinct lack of links to here. Oddtwang of Dork 12:18, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'd say it probably does belong in 40d, if only because much (but not all) of it does not apply to the old 2D version, and there will probably be some other things in the next version that'll go in this list (such as removing burrows). --Quietust 12:48, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
- Good question - I think maybe we hold off, take a "wait and see" approach? Imo too many changes are being made based on blanket assumptions - there will be a LOT of clean up necessary after the actual facts are known, and this may be one of them. (Seems I created this page on March 2 '10, which iirc is before we heard of an April release date and while the 40d migration was still underway.) Otoh, moving this to 40d makes as at least much sense as some of the other moves, and probably more. --Albedo 16:49, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
- So... 10 days have passed. Feel any more confident about what to do with this yet? I say 40d it, then maybe create a 2010 copy. Especially since removing zones is a bit different now. --Eagle0600 10:57, 8 April 2010 (UTC)