- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "v0.31 Talk:Adamantine"
(→Quality review request: new section) |
|||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
So raw adamantine has around 15000 strands.--[[Special:Contributions/190.139.218.44|190.139.218.44]] 22:54, 16 September 2010 (UTC) | So raw adamantine has around 15000 strands.--[[Special:Contributions/190.139.218.44|190.139.218.44]] 22:54, 16 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Yes, and processing one chunk of raw adamantine technically yields 15000 strands - an "adamantine strands" of dimension 15000 (as with all thread objects). --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 00:24, 17 September 2010 (UTC) | :Yes, and processing one chunk of raw adamantine technically yields 15000 strands - an "adamantine strands" of dimension 15000 (as with all thread objects). --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 00:24, 17 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Quality review request == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I don't want to add content and upgrade the quality at the same time; would someone else check and see if this article should be upgraded on the quality scale? [[User:Decius|Decius]] 01:52, 8 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:52, 8 November 2010
Magma Seas and Adamantine
From what I can tell, HFSs are no longer the only sources of adamantine. I'm looking at a magma sea with deposits lining the walls. --TarrVetus 12:59, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- It's still adamantine. Without spoiling too much, I must ask rhetorically: has anything good ever come of mining too much of it? Has there not always been a horrific punishment to go along with the unimaginable wealth it brings? How about you dig a bit deeper, my little lamb... and maybe even deeper... what's the worst that could happen? :3 --Mr Frog 22:55, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
Messed up spoiler position
See the Raw adamantine, The spoiler is in a different position, I'm going to revise it, so all non super-spoily stuff is above the spoiler. --Tarran 02:57, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Okay, that about does it
Not only did my suturer ignore the thread stored in my hospital, no, he had to pick adamantine strands, too --92.202.58.117 17:36, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Stockpiles
What kind of stockpile are adamantine strands stored on? I can't find an option for them under cloth or any other stockpile category.
- Cloth stockpiles, what is odd though is that whether or not a stockpile takes strands is determined by whetehr or not the stockpile takes 'Cloth > Thread (silk) > Phantom spider silk thread'. MLegion 20:44, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
raws
what does the tag "[DEEP_SPECIAL]" do?1337 w0n 20:12, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
- For stone, it makes it appear in the tubular veins like raw adamantine does. With metals, I'm guessing it has the same effect as [DEEP] did back in 40d - preventing the civilization from having any access to the material for purposes of trade. --Quietust 01:59, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Urist Cancels Make adamantine waffers: Needs 15000 adamantine strands.
So raw adamantine has around 15000 strands.--190.139.218.44 22:54, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, and processing one chunk of raw adamantine technically yields 15000 strands - an "adamantine strands" of dimension 15000 (as with all thread objects). --Quietust 00:24, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Quality review request
I don't want to add content and upgrade the quality at the same time; would someone else check and see if this article should be upgraded on the quality scale? Decius 01:52, 8 November 2010 (UTC)