v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "40d Talk:Troll"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→No bones?) |
Someone-else (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
So, why can't we add a parameter to the template to make it say "rotting leaves", so we can actually give information to the people reading the articles? [[User:Anydwarf|Anydwarf]] 21:47, 21 April 2008 (EDT) | So, why can't we add a parameter to the template to make it say "rotting leaves", so we can actually give information to the people reading the articles? [[User:Anydwarf|Anydwarf]] 21:47, 21 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Yes, this would be a good thing. While the article doesn't state "Their bones are valuable, but you can't get them" usage of the word "although" suggests that. --[[User:Someone-else|Someone-else]] 07:34, 22 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 11:34, 22 April 2008
I wasn't sure where else to put this...
Will a building destroying creature damage constructed walls/stairs/ramps/etc?
Or will a simple one width wall stop any damage to your fort?
--Lordmick134 11:35, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
- I did some testing with a bronze colossus -- it looks like building-destroyers ignore walls and fortifications. They are also blocked by a one-tile channel. Anydwarf 12:06, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
No bones?
Article says N/A for bones and other things. Does this mean that trolls leave no corpse or that it cannot be used after it rots?– unsigned comment by Someone-else
- It means that you can't butcher the corpse to get shit from it. It's size 9, though, so I assume it leaves nine bones. --GreyMario 20:26, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
- Hypothetically, you could butcher them if you slaughtered them as livestock, but they're not pets or pet_exotics so you can't tame them in order to do so. --JT 20:39, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
So, why can't we add a parameter to the template to make it say "rotting leaves", so we can actually give information to the people reading the articles? Anydwarf 21:47, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
- Yes, this would be a good thing. While the article doesn't state "Their bones are valuable, but you can't get them" usage of the word "although" suggests that. --Someone-else 07:34, 22 April 2008 (EDT)