v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
  • v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
  • Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.

Difference between revisions of "40d Talk:Unfortunate accident"

From Dwarf Fortress Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(importing threads from Talk:Walk the Plank, adjusting headings for clearer structure)
 
Line 39: Line 39:
 
=== Platform Collapse ===
 
=== Platform Collapse ===
 
How is one supposed to build the lever at the end of the bridge?  I tried building a floor to plant the lever on, and while the dwarves did try, the floor just instantly collapsed when complete. --[[User:Corona688|Corona688]] 14:00, 2 November 2008 (EST)
 
How is one supposed to build the lever at the end of the bridge?  I tried building a floor to plant the lever on, and while the dwarves did try, the floor just instantly collapsed when complete. --[[User:Corona688|Corona688]] 14:00, 2 November 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
== Should that really be here? ==
 +
I don't know about that 'walk the plank' section being in this article, it runs counter to the tone of the rest of it. The other sections are tongue-in-cheek, and then suddenly it starts blowing a raspberry all over your face. Unless someone could rewrite it to fit the tone. That'd be impressive.  --[[User:Navian|Navian]] 10:23, 20 November 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 15:23, 20 November 2008

Walk the Plank

These threads were formerly at Talk:Walk the Plank, which was merged with this article.

Applied use

How, precisely, are you supposed to get your victim to walk to the kill zone? I don't see that mentioned here. --ThunderClaw 09:51, 31 October 2008 (EDT)

...Build another lever at the end of the plank and link it to both the bridge and the support; Set the workshop profile for the lever to the noble you would like to be rid of; Pull the lever Random832 10:29, 31 October 2008 (EDT)

Though it's not clear to me why the bridge needs to be retractable. It seems like this would work just as well with a permanent bridge. Random832 10:31, 31 October 2008 (EDT)

Why do you need all the trouble with bonus mechanisms and supports? Just build a bridge over the lava and put the lever on it. That way it is even re-usable. You might want to mention this here, because this seems needlessly complex.--Destor 11:12, 31 October 2008 (EDT)

Can you actually build the lever on the bridge though? I don't think you can stack things like that. --Bilkinson 11:17, 31 October 2008 (EDT)

Indeed you can't.--Maximus 11:20, 31 October 2008 (EDT)
No, you build the lever on the platform that gets collapsed, which is not a bridge. The bridge is so the platform can be walked to without being connected to adjacent floors. Random832 01:20, 1 November 2008 (EDT)

Bridges are way better way of doing this... Just get the noble between 2 locked doors (lock them when he/she comes in) and bridge and you're done. It is also reusable. --Someone-else 18:15, 1 November 2008 (EDT)

Suggest Merge

This should be merged into Unfortunate accident.
--Macdjord 14:47, 31 October 2008 (EDT)

Seconded.
--Maximus 19:20, 31 October 2008 (EDT)
Can someone add the "This page has been suggested for merging" template to the article? I don't know how.
--Macdjord 10:53, 3 November 2008 (EST)
Since there were no objections, I just went ahead and merged it. The merge can be undone if objections arise.--Maximus 13:06, 3 November 2008 (EST)
Right now, Unfortunate accident has no talk page. Could you merge this the talks as well as the article?
Done.--Maximus 16:15, 3 November 2008 (EST)

Platform Collapse

How is one supposed to build the lever at the end of the bridge? I tried building a floor to plant the lever on, and while the dwarves did try, the floor just instantly collapsed when complete. --Corona688 14:00, 2 November 2008 (EST)

Should that really be here?

I don't know about that 'walk the plank' section being in this article, it runs counter to the tone of the rest of it. The other sections are tongue-in-cheek, and then suddenly it starts blowing a raspberry all over your face. Unless someone could rewrite it to fit the tone. That'd be impressive. --Navian 10:23, 20 November 2008 (EST)