- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "40d Talk:Moghopper"
(Created page with ' == D For Dwarf == Does this really fall under any of these criteria? It may include witty humour, not-so-witty humour, bad humour, in-jokes related to the game, and references ...') |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
== D For Dwarf == | == D For Dwarf == | ||
Does this really fall under any of these criteria? It may include witty humour, not-so-witty humour, bad humour, in-jokes related to the game, and references to the Bay12 forums. Sure, it has single "joke" but it's something that anyone will get instantly that doesn't really take a giant notice on the top to inform people of. Some people see that notice and assume the article is a complete joke, because some articles with it are, but if the page only has a minor little joke in it I don't think it should qualify unless the joke also could cause major confusion. Some humour should be expected in most articles, and unless it could be excessive or confusing it's not like it needs the giant notice of "possible" humour.[[User:Shardok|Shardok]] 19:51, 20 August 2009 (UTC) | Does this really fall under any of these criteria? It may include witty humour, not-so-witty humour, bad humour, in-jokes related to the game, and references to the Bay12 forums. Sure, it has single "joke" but it's something that anyone will get instantly that doesn't really take a giant notice on the top to inform people of. Some people see that notice and assume the article is a complete joke, because some articles with it are, but if the page only has a minor little joke in it I don't think it should qualify unless the joke also could cause major confusion. Some humour should be expected in most articles, and unless it could be excessive or confusing it's not like it needs the giant notice of "possible" humour.[[User:Shardok|Shardok]] 19:51, 20 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | *I'm inclined to say "no, it doesn't", so I've removed the tag for now. --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 20:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:37, 20 August 2009
D For Dwarf
Does this really fall under any of these criteria? It may include witty humour, not-so-witty humour, bad humour, in-jokes related to the game, and references to the Bay12 forums. Sure, it has single "joke" but it's something that anyone will get instantly that doesn't really take a giant notice on the top to inform people of. Some people see that notice and assume the article is a complete joke, because some articles with it are, but if the page only has a minor little joke in it I don't think it should qualify unless the joke also could cause major confusion. Some humour should be expected in most articles, and unless it could be excessive or confusing it's not like it needs the giant notice of "possible" humour.Shardok 19:51, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- I'm inclined to say "no, it doesn't", so I've removed the tag for now. --Quietust 20:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC)