v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "40d Talk:Ethics"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Ethics: I came here for an argument) |
(→Ethics) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Do ethics have any effect on the game besides looking pretty and starting wars? I tried to make a race that thought slavery was perfectly acceptable but it wouldn't take any civilians prisoner after pillaging/destroying. Do I need [ABUSE_BODIES]? --[[User:Squeegy|Squeegy]] 20:40, 3 November 2008 (EST) | Do ethics have any effect on the game besides looking pretty and starting wars? I tried to make a race that thought slavery was perfectly acceptable but it wouldn't take any civilians prisoner after pillaging/destroying. Do I need [ABUSE_BODIES]? --[[User:Squeegy|Squeegy]] 20:40, 3 November 2008 (EST) | ||
: I'm guessing not all of these have been coded into the AI behaviors yet, with the exception of goblin snatchers and kobold thieves. All they probably do right now is spark wars through philosophical disagreements during worldgen. You know, an elf and a dwarf go for a drink, they get to talking about religion, slavery and sapient races, more drink is involved, arguments start, before you know it your civ is at war. --[[User:Jellyfishgreen|Jellyfishgreen]] 10:19, 13 January 2009 (EST) | : I'm guessing not all of these have been coded into the AI behaviors yet, with the exception of goblin snatchers and kobold thieves. All they probably do right now is spark wars through philosophical disagreements during worldgen. You know, an elf and a dwarf go for a drink, they get to talking about religion, slavery and sapient races, more drink is involved, arguments start, before you know it your civ is at war. --[[User:Jellyfishgreen|Jellyfishgreen]] 10:19, 13 January 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::What about lying, for example? I don't believe there is any way to "lie" anywhere in the game, seemingly making this ethic option moot. Worldgen stuff, maybe, but what possible impact could it have? Can lies spark wars? --[[User:Smartmo|Smartmo]] 22:10, 14 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:10, 14 May 2009
So, here's a list of the various ethics tags that I got a friend to dump for me, as I couldn't find them anywhere. If anyone else wants to make this page more pretty and better formatted that would be good, I can't get the hang of wikis --Lord.Nagash 20:18, 21 July 2008 (EDT)
Ethics
Do ethics have any effect on the game besides looking pretty and starting wars? I tried to make a race that thought slavery was perfectly acceptable but it wouldn't take any civilians prisoner after pillaging/destroying. Do I need [ABUSE_BODIES]? --Squeegy 20:40, 3 November 2008 (EST)
- I'm guessing not all of these have been coded into the AI behaviors yet, with the exception of goblin snatchers and kobold thieves. All they probably do right now is spark wars through philosophical disagreements during worldgen. You know, an elf and a dwarf go for a drink, they get to talking about religion, slavery and sapient races, more drink is involved, arguments start, before you know it your civ is at war. --Jellyfishgreen 10:19, 13 January 2009 (EST)
- What about lying, for example? I don't believe there is any way to "lie" anywhere in the game, seemingly making this ethic option moot. Worldgen stuff, maybe, but what possible impact could it have? Can lies spark wars? --Smartmo 22:10, 14 May 2009 (UTC)