v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Editing 40d Talk:Sheriff
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
You are editing a page for an older version of Dwarf Fortress ("Main" is the current version, not "40d"). Please make sure you intend to do this. If you are here by mistake, see the current page instead.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
Will anyone be unhappy if there is no sheriff/fortress guards? My new fortress is 93 dwarves large, and they seem to be just so happy (ecstatic really) without one. The dwarveses were much more upset with sheriff. | Will anyone be unhappy if there is no sheriff/fortress guards? My new fortress is 93 dwarves large, and they seem to be just so happy (ecstatic really) without one. The dwarveses were much more upset with sheriff. | ||
[[User:Dorten|Dorten]] 23:57, 8 January 2008 (EST) | [[User:Dorten|Dorten]] 23:57, 8 January 2008 (EST) | ||
:One of the problems with not having a sheriff would be leaving the actual troublemakers free for the sake of saving a few innocents. As the game progresses, the dwarves that anger easily or cannot handle stress will become increasingly likely to tantrum in times of strife, possibly upsetting other dwarves in the process. You must judge for yourself if protecting honest dwarves from unreasonable noble demands is worth letting potential murderers/vandals run wild. --[[User:Jackard|Jackard]] 02:56, 9 January 2008 (EST) | :One of the problems with not having a sheriff would be leaving the actual troublemakers free for the sake of saving a few innocents. As the game progresses, the dwarves that anger easily or cannot handle stress will become increasingly likely to tantrum in times of strife, possibly upsetting other dwarves in the process. You must judge for yourself if protecting honest dwarves from unreasonable noble demands is worth letting potential murderers/vandals run wild. --[[User:Jackard|Jackard]] 02:56, 9 January 2008 (EST) | ||
::OK, understood. For murderers and vandals I prefer having a couple dozens war dogs, who will never hurt innocent ;) [[User:Dorten|Dorten]] 04:01, 9 January 2008 (EST) | ::OK, understood. For murderers and vandals I prefer having a couple dozens war dogs, who will never hurt innocent ;) [[User:Dorten|Dorten]] 04:01, 9 January 2008 (EST) | ||
| − | + | ||
Does anybody know what the relevant skills are for a sheriff? [[User:Feldspar|Feldspar]] 09:28, 13 February 2008 (EST) | Does anybody know what the relevant skills are for a sheriff? [[User:Feldspar|Feldspar]] 09:28, 13 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| Line 12: | Line 11: | ||
:::Shoving a menacing wooden spike in him, or appointed some crippled ex-military dwarves with low combat skills (eg. a marksdwarf that got caught by the enemy (accidentally, honest!)) as sherrif/guards is good, as the beatings that they dish out will be weak, particularly if they have lost hands/arms. --[[User:Blue sam3|Blue sam3]] 15:08, 5 September 2009 (UTC) | :::Shoving a menacing wooden spike in him, or appointed some crippled ex-military dwarves with low combat skills (eg. a marksdwarf that got caught by the enemy (accidentally, honest!)) as sherrif/guards is good, as the beatings that they dish out will be weak, particularly if they have lost hands/arms. --[[User:Blue sam3|Blue sam3]] 15:08, 5 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
== armor stands == | == armor stands == | ||