- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "Dwarf Fortress Wiki:Quality"
m (→Unknown) |
(i went ahead and modified the criteria a little - makes sense?) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* May be a stub article | * May be a stub article | ||
* Lacks information | * Lacks information | ||
| − | * Has a substantial number of redlinks | + | * Has a substantial number of redlinks, very few links or no links at all |
* Contains inaccurate information | * Contains inaccurate information | ||
* Contains information that needs to be verified | * Contains information that needs to be verified | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
* Has all appropriate templates | * Has all appropriate templates | ||
* DOES NOT have any pink text at the bottom of the Article Version template (these indicate some kind of problem; for details, view the [[Template:ArticleVersion]] page) | * DOES NOT have any pink text at the bottom of the Article Version template (these indicate some kind of problem; for details, view the [[Template:ArticleVersion]] page) | ||
| + | * Is properly/sufficiently linked to other articles | ||
| + | * Contains no inaccurate information | ||
and most of the following characteristics: | and most of the following characteristics: | ||
* May contain some redlinks | * May contain some redlinks | ||
| − | * | + | * But most links are functional |
* May have a small amount of information that needs to be verified | * May have a small amount of information that needs to be verified | ||
| − | |||
* Has multiple editors | * Has multiple editors | ||
Revision as of 22:56, 10 May 2010
65.9% Fine articles (718)
31.5% Exceptional articles (343)
2.6% Masterwork articles (28)
1089 Total rated articles
18.31955922865 out of 100 overall wiki quality rating without rounding
Fine
Fine Quality Articles have many of the following characteristics:
- May be a stub article
- Lacks information
- Has a substantial number of redlinks, very few links or no links at all
- Contains inaccurate information
- Contains information that needs to be verified
- Is not categorized
To insert this template, type {{Quality|Fine}} anywhere in the page.
Exceptional
Exceptional Quality Articles have ALL of the following characteristics:
- Is properly categorized
- Has a decent amount of information
- Has all appropriate templates
- DOES NOT have any pink text at the bottom of the Article Version template (these indicate some kind of problem; for details, view the Template:ArticleVersion page)
- Is properly/sufficiently linked to other articles
- Contains no inaccurate information
and most of the following characteristics:
- May contain some redlinks
- But most links are functional
- May have a small amount of information that needs to be verified
- Has multiple editors
To insert this template, type {{Quality|Exceptional}} anywhere in the page.
Masterwork
Masterwork Quality Articles are the best of the best. Masterwork quality articles have ALL of the following characteristics:
- No redlinks are present
- Has an appropriate number of outbound links
- Links only contain links of type {{l|linkname}} except where a link to another namespace is required
- Is properly categorized
- Contains no unverified information
- Is comprehensive on the subject
- The article has multiple editors
To insert this template, type {{Quality|Masterwork}} anywhere in the page.
Unknown
Unknown Quality Articles have been tagged with a quality level not recognized by the wiki, whether accidentally (incorrect spelling or capitalization) or intentionally (to request that somebody else rate the article).
If you encounter these, please evaluate and rate them according to the criteria above.