v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
  • v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
  • Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.

Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Main page progress bar"

From Dwarf Fortress Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Undo revision 99298 by Oddtwang of Dork (Talk))
(→‎Cache?: new section)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
Neat idea. I took the liberty of adding a link to the article quality page for anyone who was thinking "how did they decide that?". Might be worth getting some sort of estimate of how many articles are unrated (of the ones in the main, DF2010 and 40d namespaces I'dve thought - maybe just the main and DF2010 ones in fact). [[User:Oddtwang of Dork|Oddtwang of Dork]] 20:03, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 
Neat idea. I took the liberty of adding a link to the article quality page for anyone who was thinking "how did they decide that?". Might be worth getting some sort of estimate of how many articles are unrated (of the ones in the main, DF2010 and 40d namespaces I'dve thought - maybe just the main and DF2010 ones in fact). [[User:Oddtwang of Dork|Oddtwang of Dork]] 20:03, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Cache? ==
 +
 +
The [[Main Page]] shows DF2012 at 71.2, but [[Dwarf fortress wiki:Quality|this page]] shows 70.8. Why? They both use the same template. Also if I edit the Quality page and preview it, I see the correct number. Is this cached? If so, why does the Main Page update? --[[User:Lethosor|Lethosor]] ([[User_talk:Lethosor|talk]]) 22:37, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:37, 12 February 2013

I like this

Good work on this, obviously you're ironing out some details but I can see where it's going and I'm all for it. Mason (T-C) 01:47, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Neat idea. I took the liberty of adding a link to the article quality page for anyone who was thinking "how did they decide that?". Might be worth getting some sort of estimate of how many articles are unrated (of the ones in the main, DF2010 and 40d namespaces I'dve thought - maybe just the main and DF2010 ones in fact). Oddtwang of Dork 20:03, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Cache?

The Main Page shows DF2012 at 71.2, but this page shows 70.8. Why? They both use the same template. Also if I edit the Quality page and preview it, I see the correct number. Is this cached? If so, why does the Main Page update? --Lethosor (talk) 22:37, 12 February 2013 (UTC)