v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
  • v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
  • Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.

Editing v0.31 Talk:Jeweler's workshop

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.

You are editing a page for an older version of Dwarf Fortress ("Main" is the current version, not "v0.31"). Please make sure you intend to do this. If you are here by mistake, see the current page instead.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 2: Line 2:
 
I've added a paragraph about order of gems in the shop. From what I've tested it seems they are always ordered from least valuable to most valuable. But as it goes with DF there might be some other condition, so please, someone confirm this. Also, glass always seem to appear at the end.
 
I've added a paragraph about order of gems in the shop. From what I've tested it seems they are always ordered from least valuable to most valuable. But as it goes with DF there might be some other condition, so please, someone confirm this. Also, glass always seem to appear at the end.
  
I've also included a little about gem setter training, which is a duplicate from [[v0.31:Gem setter]], altho the wording is different. I've included a link to the gem setter page for further info. I think it's on-topic when talking about gem value, and it's only one sentece so it shouldn't hurt that much (in terms of redundancy). [[User:Fuco|Fuco]] 21:34, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
+
I've also included a little about gem setter training, which is a duplicate from [[DF2010:Gem setter]], altho the wording is different. I've included a link to the gem setter page for further info. I think it's on-topic when talking about gem value, and it's only one sentece so it shouldn't hurt that much (in terms of redundancy). [[User:Fuco|Fuco]] 21:34, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
  
 
:There are (at least in v .31.12) a few exceptions to the "ordered by value" rule. In particular I've seen at least one or two value 10 gems which appear in the midsts of the value 2 and 3 gems. [[Special:Contributions/202.156.10.234|202.156.10.234]] 23:37, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 
:There are (at least in v .31.12) a few exceptions to the "ordered by value" rule. In particular I've seen at least one or two value 10 gems which appear in the midsts of the value 2 and 3 gems. [[Special:Contributions/202.156.10.234|202.156.10.234]] 23:37, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Please note that all contributions to Dwarf Fortress Wiki are considered to be released under the GFDL & MIT (see Dwarf Fortress Wiki:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Please sign comments with ~~~~

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)