v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Raveturned"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Raveturned (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Personal opinion == | == Personal opinion == | ||
What do you consider being "decent amount of information"? Because on articles like that, there isn't much to be said. So decent amount of information may defer from article to article. It's not about length (that's taken care of automatically), it's about how much about the certain thing is said, divided by how much information can possibly be said. [[User:Speed112|Speed112]] 14:38, 22 May 2010 (UTC) | What do you consider being "decent amount of information"? Because on articles like that, there isn't much to be said. So decent amount of information may defer from article to article. It's not about length (that's taken care of automatically), it's about how much about the certain thing is said, divided by how much information can possibly be said. [[User:Speed112|Speed112]] 14:38, 22 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | :I don't consider myself to be a veteran player just yet, so I'm not assuming I know all that can be said about the subjects of the pages I'm rating. As such, I can't really make a call on whether there's a "decent amount" of information. If you disagree with a particular rating I've given, feel free to re-rate a page. My main concern is getting pages off of the "Unknown Quality Articles" list. --[[User:Raveturned|Raveturned]] 14:54, 22 May 2010 (UTC) | |
| − | I don't consider myself to be a veteran player just yet, so I'm not assuming I know all that can be said about the subjects of the pages I'm rating. As such, I can't really make a call on whether there's a "decent amount" of information. If you disagree with a particular rating I've given, feel free to re-rate a page. My main concern is getting pages off of the "Unknown Quality Articles" list. --[[User:Raveturned|Raveturned]] 14:54, 22 May 2010 (UTC) | + | ::Understood, go on with rating then; that's why it was made. :) [[User:Speed112|Speed112]] 15:03, 22 May 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 15:03, 22 May 2010
Personal opinion[edit]
What do you consider being "decent amount of information"? Because on articles like that, there isn't much to be said. So decent amount of information may defer from article to article. It's not about length (that's taken care of automatically), it's about how much about the certain thing is said, divided by how much information can possibly be said. Speed112 14:38, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
- I don't consider myself to be a veteran player just yet, so I'm not assuming I know all that can be said about the subjects of the pages I'm rating. As such, I can't really make a call on whether there's a "decent amount" of information. If you disagree with a particular rating I've given, feel free to re-rate a page. My main concern is getting pages off of the "Unknown Quality Articles" list. --Raveturned 14:54, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
- Understood, go on with rating then; that's why it was made. :) Speed112 15:03, 22 May 2010 (UTC)