v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "v0.31 Talk:Minable resources"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Given that stones/ores and gems all have fundamentally different uses (gems can only be used for cutting/setting and making windows), I'm not sure it makes a lot of sense to put them all in the same table. The pages for [[gem]], [[stone]], and [[ore]] contain pretty much the same information, and I honestly think the consolidation attained via those 3 pages is sufficient. --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 00:19, 5 July 2010 (UTC) | Given that stones/ores and gems all have fundamentally different uses (gems can only be used for cutting/setting and making windows), I'm not sure it makes a lot of sense to put them all in the same table. The pages for [[gem]], [[stone]], and [[ore]] contain pretty much the same information, and I honestly think the consolidation attained via those 3 pages is sufficient. --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 00:19, 5 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I agree. --[[User:Nahno|Nahno]] 16:01, 5 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:01, 5 July 2010
Given that stones/ores and gems all have fundamentally different uses (gems can only be used for cutting/setting and making windows), I'm not sure it makes a lot of sense to put them all in the same table. The pages for gem, stone, and ore contain pretty much the same information, and I honestly think the consolidation attained via those 3 pages is sufficient. --Quietust 00:19, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
- I agree. --Nahno 16:01, 5 July 2010 (UTC)