- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Rhenaya"
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
:::::If you want the decoration at the top of the page, you can put the raw HTML there yourself, but don't use the template since that '''categorizes your user page''', and the quality templates aren't intended to be used on any pages outside of the 23a, 40d, or DF2010 namespaces. --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 01:57, 6 April 2011 (UTC) | :::::If you want the decoration at the top of the page, you can put the raw HTML there yourself, but don't use the template since that '''categorizes your user page''', and the quality templates aren't intended to be used on any pages outside of the 23a, 40d, or DF2010 namespaces. --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 01:57, 6 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
:::::well briess told me it was ok, so i dont see why its a problem now, it isnt counted in the related namespace pagestuff anyway, as user is a different namespace | :::::well briess told me it was ok, so i dont see why its a problem now, it isnt counted in the related namespace pagestuff anyway, as user is a different namespace | ||
| + | :::::::Just subst out the html and remove the categorization and there should be no issues --[[User:Briess|Briess]] 18:52, 6 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:52, 6 April 2011
General
please dont edit my userpage without account and without explanition... its not funny or anything --Rhenaya 20:41, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Joblist
Hehe, like what you did there... say, what profession would you be? :) Lichenous 10:44, 30 October 2008 (EDT)
i would say a bookkeeper, after all its the first job "my" dwarf do in alle forts, and its the most office related job anyway. else i prefer hunting... with axes :D in df at least --Rhenaya 11:06, 30 October 2008 (EDT)
Rhenaya Libashsedil, Axedwarf demanded wild strawberry wine. Or cookies... or anything for my neat tempalte... or just talk to me :p --Rhenaya 13:24, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
tiny straight scar on lower arm
As applied to the more conventional human form, those words suddenly become quite a bit more disquieting.
Unless it was just a cat or something like that. 76.105.197.110 00:18, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
- (cur) (prev) 13:38, 26 April 2010 Rhenaya (Talk | contribs) (3,338 bytes) (had a fight with a cat centuries ago :x) (undo) --Rhenaya 03:40, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Masterwork?
It appears to me that, while a fairly well-done page, this page does not qualify for Masterwork status. Specifically, it does not cover an " important 'must-read' topic", nor does it have multiple editors.
- please sign discussions, this page doesnt not count towards the masterwork counter on the frontpage, and we already had some talk about that, its a user page, and a dwarfy one too, so i dont see a problem ;) --Rhenaya 08:02, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
- That's all well and good, but Masterwork quality is well-defined. Your userpage does not fit these qualifications, and therefore should not be Masterwork. That's the problem.
- Find something more important to care about. User pages are not a major concern. --JohnnyMadhouse 15:06, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- I'm going to agree with the anonymous poster. No need to toot your own horn. --Met 01:50, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
- If you want the decoration at the top of the page, you can put the raw HTML there yourself, but don't use the template since that categorizes your user page, and the quality templates aren't intended to be used on any pages outside of the 23a, 40d, or DF2010 namespaces. --Quietust 01:57, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
- well briess told me it was ok, so i dont see why its a problem now, it isnt counted in the related namespace pagestuff anyway, as user is a different namespace
- Just subst out the html and remove the categorization and there should be no issues --Briess 18:52, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
- I'm going to agree with the anonymous poster. No need to toot your own horn. --Met 01:50, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
- Find something more important to care about. User pages are not a major concern. --JohnnyMadhouse 15:06, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- That's all well and good, but Masterwork quality is well-defined. Your userpage does not fit these qualifications, and therefore should not be Masterwork. That's the problem.