v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "v0.31 Talk:Graphite"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Possible mistake in RAW file.) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===Raw seems to be wrong=== | ===Raw seems to be wrong=== | ||
| − | It has a comment about brimstone being a better name. That shouldn't be in the raw of graphite. Can anyone verify whether this is really a mistake of Toady, or a mistake of the one who posted the raw? | + | It has a comment about brimstone being a better name. That shouldn't be in the raw of graphite. Can anyone verify whether this is really a mistake of Toady, or a mistake of the one who posted the raw? --12:54, 11 October 2011 (UTC) |
| − | --12: | + | :It's not a bug in the raws - it's a bug in the code the wiki uses for extracting the raws for individual items. Specifically, it takes inorganic_stone_mineral.txt and takes all of the text from "[INORGANIC:GRAPHITE]" up to the next "[INORGANIC:", which happens to include the one line of text before "[INORGANIC:BRIMSTONE]". --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 12:59, 11 October 2011 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 12:59, 11 October 2011
Raw seems to be wrong[edit]
It has a comment about brimstone being a better name. That shouldn't be in the raw of graphite. Can anyone verify whether this is really a mistake of Toady, or a mistake of the one who posted the raw? --12:54, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- It's not a bug in the raws - it's a bug in the code the wiki uses for extracting the raws for individual items. Specifically, it takes inorganic_stone_mineral.txt and takes all of the text from "[INORGANIC:GRAPHITE]" up to the next "[INORGANIC:", which happens to include the one line of text before "[INORGANIC:BRIMSTONE]". --Quietust 12:59, 11 October 2011 (UTC)