- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Main page progress bar"
(→Cache?: reply to self) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Neat idea. I took the liberty of adding a link to the article quality page for anyone who was thinking "how did they decide that?". Might be worth getting some sort of estimate of how many articles are unrated (of the ones in the main, DF2010 and 40d namespaces I'dve thought - maybe just the main and DF2010 ones in fact). [[User:Oddtwang of Dork|Oddtwang of Dork]] 20:03, 25 April 2010 (UTC) | Neat idea. I took the liberty of adding a link to the article quality page for anyone who was thinking "how did they decide that?". Might be worth getting some sort of estimate of how many articles are unrated (of the ones in the main, DF2010 and 40d namespaces I'dve thought - maybe just the main and DF2010 ones in fact). [[User:Oddtwang of Dork|Oddtwang of Dork]] 20:03, 25 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Cache? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | The [[Main Page]] shows DF2012 at 71.2, but [[Dwarf fortress wiki:Quality|this page]] shows 70.8. Why? They both use the same template. Also if I edit the Quality page and preview it, I see the correct number. Is this cached? If so, why does the Main Page update? --[[User:Lethosor|Lethosor]] ([[User_talk:Lethosor|talk]]) 22:37, 12 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | : Never mind, it looks like it is indeed the site cache. These bars appear on several different pages, each with different numbers. If I purge my user page, the new number shows up, so I assume purging other pages would accomplish the same thing. --{{User:Lethosor/sig}} 18:24, 10 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:24, 10 March 2013
I like this[edit]
Good work on this, obviously you're ironing out some details but I can see where it's going and I'm all for it. Mason (T-C) 01:47, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
Neat idea. I took the liberty of adding a link to the article quality page for anyone who was thinking "how did they decide that?". Might be worth getting some sort of estimate of how many articles are unrated (of the ones in the main, DF2010 and 40d namespaces I'dve thought - maybe just the main and DF2010 ones in fact). Oddtwang of Dork 20:03, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
Cache?[edit]
The Main Page shows DF2012 at 71.2, but this page shows 70.8. Why? They both use the same template. Also if I edit the Quality page and preview it, I see the correct number. Is this cached? If so, why does the Main Page update? --Lethosor (talk) 22:37, 12 February 2013 (UTC)