- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "40d Talk:Stone"
Turgid Bolk (talk | contribs) (Individual pages) |
|||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
:: "vein" and "cluster" [[User:VengefulDonut|VengefulDonut]] 17:29, 4 November 2007 (EST) | :: "vein" and "cluster" [[User:VengefulDonut|VengefulDonut]] 17:29, 4 November 2007 (EST) | ||
: Okay, I've added something like it with some of my own formatting through a program, but it will still need a lot of cleanup. --[[User:Valdemar|Valdemar]] 17:53, 4 November 2007 (EST) | : Okay, I've added something like it with some of my own formatting through a program, but it will still need a lot of cleanup. --[[User:Valdemar|Valdemar]] 17:53, 4 November 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Individual pages == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'm of the opinion that [[ore]]s and [[economic stone]]s should probably get their own page, but the rest can just redirect here. There just isn't much to say about [[cryolite]] or [[jet]]. They're rocks, they have about such-and-such a value, the end. How about it? --[[User:Turgid Bolk|Turgid Bolk]] 20:59, 4 November 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 01:59, 5 November 2007
I notice that Economic stone lists economic + metal ores, my edit to the stone page divides it as the stockpiles do. -- infinity
Is there any kind of stone that isn't mineable? If not, then I don't think that "Mineable Stone" makes sense as a section header. --Peristarkawan 13:36, 31 October 2007 (EDT)
Good point, I think I was trying to separate that from "soil" and other things that don't leave behind anything ... I shouldn't edit so early in the morning. --Infinity 20:45, 31 October 2007 (EDT)
Now all we need is graphical representations! Schm0 16:24, 1 November 2007 (EDT)
What about ICE BLOCKS? those count as stones for some purposes. --Thehunterunseen 19:27, 1 November 2007 (EDT)
- I haven't been able to get my dorfs to do anything with ice blocks yet. Haven't managed them to go down (or up) the stairs into the frozen river I had anyway, so... (I was explicitly trying NOT to mine out the side of it)--Draco18s 00:48, 2 November 2007 (EDT)
Shouldn't raw adamantine be under metal ore as opposed to "other stone"? --RedKing 00:43, 2 November 2007 (EDT)
- It's probably due to where it's grouped in the raws. --Alfador 14:40, 2 November 2007 (EDT)
Why are we listing platinum nuggets instead of native platinum, when talking about it in it's unmined state? --Trukkle 10:23, 3 November 2007 (EDT)
I am thinking about implementing a more detailed table style for this area. The existing tables are nice, but there should be much more information on this page. Perhaps something like this:
| Name | Tile | Type | Uses |
|---|---|---|---|
| Olivine |   |
Generic | Stoneworking |
What do you guys think? Schm0 15:41, 3 November 2007 (EDT)
- I really like that, Schm0 --Tracker 18:29, 3 November 2007 (EDT)
Someone, with correct formatting, add this to the bottom of the page. http://idisk.mac.com/fire_drake-Public/DF_StoneOre_Table.htm -penguin
- I'd try, but what does the 'V' or 'C' mean in the table? --Valdemar 10:06, 4 November 2007 (EST)
- "vein" and "cluster" VengefulDonut 17:29, 4 November 2007 (EST)
- Okay, I've added something like it with some of my own formatting through a program, but it will still need a lot of cleanup. --Valdemar 17:53, 4 November 2007 (EST)
Individual pages
I'm of the opinion that ores and economic stones should probably get their own page, but the rest can just redirect here. There just isn't much to say about cryolite or jet. They're rocks, they have about such-and-such a value, the end. How about it? --Turgid Bolk 20:59, 4 November 2007 (EST)