v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "Dwarf Fortress Wiki talk:Announcements"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Autohide== | ==Autohide== | ||
After about another day or two, I'm going to re-enable autohide for all users for this announcements box, if there are no objections. --[[User:Briess|Briess]] 03:03, 4 April 2010 (UTC) | After about another day or two, I'm going to re-enable autohide for all users for this announcements box, if there are no objections. --[[User:Briess|Briess]] 03:03, 4 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | :Well, I'd still suggest the current method. However, if we do re-enable autohide, do it through adding importScript('User:blahblahblahblah'); in common.js rather than adding "collapsed". That way we can still use the update div to force show the box. [[user:Emi|<span style="color:#8a4e4e">Emi</span>]] [[user_talk:Emi|<span style="color:#6a3e4e">[T]</span>]] 05:21, 7 April 2010 (UTC) | |
==Links== | ==Links== | ||
"Please create links with <nowiki>{{L|Page name}}</nowiki> instead of <nowiki>[[Page name]]</nowiki> if the link is for the same version as the article. '''Please do not update existing 40d links (blue or red) with this method.'''" - What exactly, then, is the point of using the template at all? Why use it only for new pages but not for existing pages? --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 13:59, 5 April 2010 (UTC) | "Please create links with <nowiki>{{L|Page name}}</nowiki> instead of <nowiki>[[Page name]]</nowiki> if the link is for the same version as the article. '''Please do not update existing 40d links (blue or red) with this method.'''" - What exactly, then, is the point of using the template at all? Why use it only for new pages but not for existing pages? --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 13:59, 5 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Actually, it was because it was much easier to program EmiBot to follow links of the [[]] format. So it was about the redlink tagging. Now that they've all been tagged, the message no longer matters -- and once I get my main machine up and running, EmiBot will be changing all the links back. [[user:Emi|<span style="color:#8a4e4e">Emi</span>]] [[user_talk:Emi|<span style="color:#6a3e4e">[T]</span>]] 05:21, 7 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 05:21, 7 April 2010
Autohide
After about another day or two, I'm going to re-enable autohide for all users for this announcements box, if there are no objections. --Briess 03:03, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Well, I'd still suggest the current method. However, if we do re-enable autohide, do it through adding importScript('User:blahblahblahblah'); in common.js rather than adding "collapsed". That way we can still use the update div to force show the box. Emi [T] 05:21, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Links
"Please create links with {{L|Page name}} instead of [[Page name]] if the link is for the same version as the article. Please do not update existing 40d links (blue or red) with this method." - What exactly, then, is the point of using the template at all? Why use it only for new pages but not for existing pages? --Quietust 13:59, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, it was because it was much easier to program EmiBot to follow links of the [[]] format. So it was about the redlink tagging. Now that they've all been tagged, the message no longer matters -- and once I get my main machine up and running, EmiBot will be changing all the links back. Emi [T] 05:21, 7 April 2010 (UTC)