v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Ancient History"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | == Regarding DF2010 Talk:Goblin == | |
| + | |||
| + | Why did you remove the discussion on [[Goblinite]]? While goblinite has its own page (to the [[Talk:Goblinite|talk page]] of which you didn't paste the removed comments) I find that discussion (relatively) relevant for the [[DF2010:Goblin]] page. Instead, I think it would have made sense to add a concluding comment that the goblinite page has been created. --[[User:Nahno|Nahno]] 15:16, 29 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | : Honestly, I thought the issue had pretty much been resolved with the creation of the goblinite page and it was no longer relevant. Feel free to roll it back if you disagree. -- [[User:Ancient History|Ancient History]] 21:45, 29 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:45, 29 June 2010
Regarding DF2010 Talk:Goblin[edit]
Why did you remove the discussion on Goblinite? While goblinite has its own page (to the talk page of which you didn't paste the removed comments) I find that discussion (relatively) relevant for the DF2010:Goblin page. Instead, I think it would have made sense to add a concluding comment that the goblinite page has been created. --Nahno 15:16, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Honestly, I thought the issue had pretty much been resolved with the creation of the goblinite page and it was no longer relevant. Feel free to roll it back if you disagree. -- Ancient History 21:45, 29 June 2010 (UTC)