v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "Template talk:BIcon"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→IDs) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:That could be arranged, I'll work on it --[[User:DUMBELLS|dUMBELLS]] 03:43, 4 April 2011 (UTC) | :That could be arranged, I'll work on it --[[User:DUMBELLS|dUMBELLS]] 03:43, 4 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
::Done, for the most part --[[User:DUMBELLS|dUMBELLS]] 05:46, 4 April 2011 (UTC) | ::Done, for the most part --[[User:DUMBELLS|dUMBELLS]] 05:46, 4 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
| − | :::And now for | + | :::And now for a rhetorical (because I've already fixed the template accordingly) question - why require freshwater/saltwater to be specified separately for rivers and wetlands when you ''already have that information'' from the biome ID? --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 14:27, 4 April 2011 (UTC) |
| + | ::::This was something I considered, the reason why I left them separate was for when you might need to list, for example, tropical and temperate saltwater rivers so you wouldn't need to include saltwater twice. The way you've edited it makes sense however, and I think it should be kept formatted the way it is. --[[User:DUMBELLS|dUMBELLS]] 18:29, 4 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:29, 4 April 2011
IDs[edit]
Any reason for not using the game's internal biome identifiers listed here? --Quietust 03:34, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- That could be arranged, I'll work on it --dUMBELLS 03:43, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- Done, for the most part --dUMBELLS 05:46, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- And now for a rhetorical (because I've already fixed the template accordingly) question - why require freshwater/saltwater to be specified separately for rivers and wetlands when you already have that information from the biome ID? --Quietust 14:27, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- This was something I considered, the reason why I left them separate was for when you might need to list, for example, tropical and temperate saltwater rivers so you wouldn't need to include saltwater twice. The way you've edited it makes sense however, and I think it should be kept formatted the way it is. --dUMBELLS 18:29, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- And now for a rhetorical (because I've already fixed the template accordingly) question - why require freshwater/saltwater to be specified separately for rivers and wetlands when you already have that information from the biome ID? --Quietust 14:27, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- Done, for the most part --dUMBELLS 05:46, 4 April 2011 (UTC)