Template talk:RawToTable

Food Source

I'm not sure how to generate whether or not a creature is a food source..
Going through the creature tokens, these are some clues I found:
Definitely a food source: [FISHITEM] / [MILKABLE] (in some sense a food source)
Disqualifiers: [ITEMCORPSE] / [FANCIFUL] / [NOMEAT] / [NOT_BUTCHERABLE] / [SMALL_REMAINS] --dUMBELLS 18:57, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Some more disqualifiers for Dwarves would be [INTELLIGENT] and [CAN_LEARN] (and [SLOW_LEARNER]), and likely also [CAN_SPEAK]. --Quietust 19:01, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

This is what I've come up with, but it is in need of iterating,

 {{#switch:Y
 |{{#if:{{#df_tagentry:{{{1}}}|ITEMCORPSE||1}}|N|Y}}={{Cgr|N}}
 |{{#if:{{#df_tagentry:{{{1}}}|FANCIFUL||1}}|N|Y}}={{Cgr|N}}
 |{{#if:{{#df_tagentry:{{{1}}}|NOMEAT||1}}|N|Y}}={{Cgr|N}}
 |{{#if:{{#df_tagentry:{{{1}}}|NOT_BUTCHERABLE||1}}|N|Y}}={{Cgr|N}}
 |{{#if:{{#df_tagentry:{{{1}}}|SMALL_REMAINS||1}}|N|Y}}={{Cgr|N}}
 |{{#if:{{#df_tagentry:{{{1}}}|INTELLIGENT||1}}|N|Y}}={{Cgr|N}}
 |{{#if:{{#df_tagentry:{{{1}}}|CAN_LEARN||1}}|N|Y}}={{Cgr|N}}
 |{{#if:{{#df_tagentry:{{{1}}}|CAN_SPEAK||1}}|N|Y}}={{Cgr|N}}
 |#default={{#if:{{#if:{{#df_tagentry:{{{1}}}|FISHITEM||1}}||NONEMPTY}}{{#if:{{#df_tagentry:{{{1}}}|MILKABLE||1}}||NONEMPTY}}|{{Cgr|Y}}|N/A}}
 }} 

--dUMBELLS 20:09, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

That seems to be working, actually. Good stuff. --dUMBELLS 20:28, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

I'm not sure that FANCIFUL should prevent a creature from providing food - dragons, yetis, sasquatches, hydras, and rocs are all fanciful, and I'm pretty sure they're all butcherable. --Quietust 02:10, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Also, if you want to check for the presence of a tag, use {{#df_tag:raw data|tag name}} - if it exists it'll return 1, otherwise it'll return a blank string. If you haven't already read the documentation on my user page, you are highly encouraged to do so. --Quietust 02:13, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

I actually ran into that problem with the [FANCIFUL] tag and already corrected it on the template. Also, I have read the documentation, but obviously not very well! I just went with what worked first in this case. Other than that, the actual functions themselves are very useful, nice work. --dUMBELLS 02:32, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

awesome. --Ral 11:43, 22 April 2011 (UTC)