v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "40d Talk:Example - some fish"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It may be a good idea to create a damblock column.--[[User:Zchris13|Zchris13]] 00:11, 22 May 2009 (UTC) | It may be a good idea to create a damblock column.--[[User:Zchris13|Zchris13]] 00:11, 22 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
:?"damblock"? Don't know what that is - go for it. But all this "article" was intended to do was demonstrate that a table could both 1) include all info currently included in 50 separate "creature" articles, and 2) do it better. Puts all related info on 1 page, easier to read and compare, far less pages overall. (Readers should see [[Talk:Main Page]] for context.)--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 01:18, 22 May 2009 (UTC) | :?"damblock"? Don't know what that is - go for it. But all this "article" was intended to do was demonstrate that a table could both 1) include all info currently included in 50 separate "creature" articles, and 2) do it better. Puts all related info on 1 page, easier to read and compare, far less pages overall. (Readers should see [[Talk:Main Page]] for context.)--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 01:18, 22 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| − | :Edit - <slaps head> Oh, "damage block". Duh. Jo no habla Dwarfol mui bueno. Yeah, that would be good, and more info | + | :Edit - <slaps head> Oh, "damage block". Duh. Jo no habla Dwarfol mui bueno. Yeah, that would be good, and more info than is presented in the current templates. The entire "Game Object Data" info (currently in spoilers on each page) should not be lost either - but as is it really doesn't fit in these table cells very well (tho' it might if that cell could be forced wider - not my skill set). I'm thinking either a different table or entirely diff page, since it's kinda "advanced" information.--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 05:54, 22 May 2009 (UTC) |
| − | + | Game Object Data cell spacing fixed - see main page--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 06:23, 22 May 2009 (UTC) | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | Is this example still needed, or can it be deleted? --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 01:15, 2 May 2010 (UTC) | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 01:15, 2 May 2010
It may be a good idea to create a damblock column.--Zchris13 00:11, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- ?"damblock"? Don't know what that is - go for it. But all this "article" was intended to do was demonstrate that a table could both 1) include all info currently included in 50 separate "creature" articles, and 2) do it better. Puts all related info on 1 page, easier to read and compare, far less pages overall. (Readers should see Talk:Main Page for context.)--Albedo 01:18, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Edit - <slaps head> Oh, "damage block". Duh. Jo no habla Dwarfol mui bueno. Yeah, that would be good, and more info than is presented in the current templates. The entire "Game Object Data" info (currently in spoilers on each page) should not be lost either - but as is it really doesn't fit in these table cells very well (tho' it might if that cell could be forced wider - not my skill set). I'm thinking either a different table or entirely diff page, since it's kinda "advanced" information.--Albedo 05:54, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Game Object Data cell spacing fixed - see main page--Albedo 06:23, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Is this example still needed, or can it be deleted? --Quietust 01:15, 2 May 2010 (UTC)