- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "Dwarf Fortress Wiki talk:Current events"
m (Created page with 'AHA... so someone finally put this big blank space, begging to be used, to use. ;) -~~~') |
(get rid of {{L}}) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
AHA... so someone finally put this big blank space, begging to be used, to use. ;) -[[User:N9103|Edward]] | AHA... so someone finally put this big blank space, begging to be used, to use. ;) -[[User:N9103|Edward]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | :<nods> Seemed like the best place to call attention to all the little "behind the scenes" discussions that might otherwise get overlooked.--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 08:50, 24 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Page Policy == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Do we want to remove items as they are resolved? Or leave stuff here as a default archive of past "events"? For instance, the multi-page "defense" re-organization has long ago been finalized - is there any reason to keep the notice here? Otoh, some of the "discussions" are on-going, even if on haitus or back-burned for the moment.)--[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 18:44, 10 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Handling template breaking of redirects? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | How do we want to handle this? For example, <nowiki>{{L|Furnace Operator}}</nowiki> doesn't work; nor does <nowiki>{{L|pearlash}}</nowiki> - you have to use <nowiki>{{L|ash|pearlash}}</nowiki> to get it to go to the right place. Note that these examples don't work on this page; see [[40d:kiln]] for examples. --[[User:Bombcar|Bombcar]] 17:56, 3 April 2010 (UTC) (Reposted here from Style discussion page by --[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 21:10, 3 April 2010 (UTC)) | ||
| + | :In the case of <nowiki>{{L|Furnace Operator}}</nowiki>, correct wiki style suggests that the link should read <nowiki>{{L|Furnace operator}}</nowiki>. However, since this mistake will reoccur with high probability, a redirect could be appropriate. In other cases, redirects or fixing the links are both appropriate responses to the broken links. --[[User:Briess|Briess]] 22:05, 3 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:44, 8 December 2011
AHA... so someone finally put this big blank space, begging to be used, to use. ;) -Edward
- <nods> Seemed like the best place to call attention to all the little "behind the scenes" discussions that might otherwise get overlooked.--Albedo 08:50, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Page Policy[edit]
Do we want to remove items as they are resolved? Or leave stuff here as a default archive of past "events"? For instance, the multi-page "defense" re-organization has long ago been finalized - is there any reason to keep the notice here? Otoh, some of the "discussions" are on-going, even if on haitus or back-burned for the moment.)--Albedo 18:44, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Handling template breaking of redirects?[edit]
How do we want to handle this? For example, {{L|Furnace Operator}} doesn't work; nor does {{L|pearlash}} - you have to use {{L|ash|pearlash}} to get it to go to the right place. Note that these examples don't work on this page; see 40d:kiln for examples. --Bombcar 17:56, 3 April 2010 (UTC) (Reposted here from Style discussion page by --Albedo 21:10, 3 April 2010 (UTC))
- In the case of {{L|Furnace Operator}}, correct wiki style suggests that the link should read {{L|Furnace operator}}. However, since this mistake will reoccur with high probability, a redirect could be appropriate. In other cases, redirects or fixing the links are both appropriate responses to the broken links. --Briess 22:05, 3 April 2010 (UTC)