v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "40d Talk:Fire-safe"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: There is a in-game distinction between fire-safe and magma safe. Apparently some stones are better at heat than others. Fire-safe are only meant for regular furnaces, not magma. (although ...) |
(flux not fire safe?) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
A suggestion could be to make a table of materials and check which one can withstand regular heat and which ones can withstand magma. | A suggestion could be to make a table of materials and check which one can withstand regular heat and which ones can withstand magma. | ||
[[User:Sergius|Sergius]] 22:09, 31 October 2007 (EDT) | [[User:Sergius|Sergius]] 22:09, 31 October 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == flux not fire safe? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'm fairly sure flux is no longer considered fire-safe. | ||
Revision as of 20:56, 5 December 2007
There is a in-game distinction between fire-safe and magma safe. Apparently some stones are better at heat than others. Fire-safe are only meant for regular furnaces, not magma. (although magma resisting materials are also fire-safe, of course). That's why I linked to two separate pages. A suggestion could be to make a table of materials and check which one can withstand regular heat and which ones can withstand magma. Sergius 22:09, 31 October 2007 (EDT)
flux not fire safe?
I'm fairly sure flux is no longer considered fire-safe.