v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "Masterwork Talk:Main Page"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Quality: new section) |
UristDaVinci (talk | contribs) (→Pretentious: new section) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Should articles in this namespace be rated? I don't see any reason not to (except that the overall percentages might not be accurate), but it looks like the [[:Category:Masterwork:Tattered Quality Articles|categories]] were [http://dwarffortresswiki.org/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=&user=&page=Category%3AMasterwork%3ATattered_Quality_Articles&year=&month=-1 deleted]. Thoughts? --{{User:Lethosor/sig}} 20:59, 18 April 2013 (UTC) | Should articles in this namespace be rated? I don't see any reason not to (except that the overall percentages might not be accurate), but it looks like the [[:Category:Masterwork:Tattered Quality Articles|categories]] were [http://dwarffortresswiki.org/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=&user=&page=Category%3AMasterwork%3ATattered_Quality_Articles&year=&month=-1 deleted]. Thoughts? --{{User:Lethosor/sig}} 20:59, 18 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Pretentious == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Since when did the "masterwork" mod become important important enough to deserve incorporation into the wiki? Does this mean that we can other mods' content to the wiki? There is a risk that "vanilla" articles will become contaminated with MW links, in the sense that a noob user could go to a MW page without knowing that it was an unofficial mod. --[[User:UristDaVinci|UristDaVinci]] ([[User talk:UristDaVinci|talk]]) 04:40, 19 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:40, 19 April 2013
Created --Briess (talk) 17:19, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Quality
Should articles in this namespace be rated? I don't see any reason not to (except that the overall percentages might not be accurate), but it looks like the categories were deleted. Thoughts? --Lethosor (talk) 20:59, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Pretentious
Since when did the "masterwork" mod become important important enough to deserve incorporation into the wiki? Does this mean that we can other mods' content to the wiki? There is a risk that "vanilla" articles will become contaminated with MW links, in the sense that a noob user could go to a MW page without knowing that it was an unofficial mod. --UristDaVinci (talk) 04:40, 19 April 2013 (UTC)