- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "DF2014 Talk:Giant desert scorpion"
Death Dragon (talk | contribs) (→Raws: new section) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::Aha! Thanks a bunch. :) --[[User:Cali|Cali]] ([[User talk:Cali|talk]]) 00:17, 2 March 2015 (UTC) | ::Aha! Thanks a bunch. :) --[[User:Cali|Cali]] ([[User talk:Cali|talk]]) 00:17, 2 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Raws == | ||
| + | |||
| + | The raws for the creature should stay on this article. The article itself says that the raws are provided "by this page" without actually providing the raws. The raws I posted here are also NOT identical to the raws on the old wiki versions as those are outdated and the newer ones can't really be found anywhere unless you manually download one of the old 40.-42. versions. Frankly, I see no reason why you would remove specifically only the raws from this page while keeping the rest up. Besides this, if anyone who knows more about wiki coding could make that text box look a bit prettier, would be nice. --[[User:Death Dragon|Death Dragon]] ([[User talk:Death Dragon|talk]]) 21:06, 30 September 2018 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:06, 30 September 2018
Lack of variations
Is there any way to remove the variations section from the infobox since giant desert scorpions don't have variations? I added a note to the article, but I couldn't figure out how to edit the infobox. --Cali (talk) 22:14, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Raws
The raws for the creature should stay on this article. The article itself says that the raws are provided "by this page" without actually providing the raws. The raws I posted here are also NOT identical to the raws on the old wiki versions as those are outdated and the newer ones can't really be found anywhere unless you manually download one of the old 40.-42. versions. Frankly, I see no reason why you would remove specifically only the raws from this page while keeping the rest up. Besides this, if anyone who knows more about wiki coding could make that text box look a bit prettier, would be nice. --Death Dragon (talk) 21:06, 30 September 2018 (UTC)