v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "Dwarf Fortress Wiki talk:Copyrights"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "== Licensing == thumb|right The message at the bottom of the df wiki says that all content is available under GFDL & MIT. I wonder if that is reall...") |
(rsp) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
What are your thoughts? [[User:VengefulDonut|VengefulDonut]] ([[User talk:VengefulDonut|talk]]) 16:49, 9 December 2018 (UTC) | What are your thoughts? [[User:VengefulDonut|VengefulDonut]] ([[User talk:VengefulDonut|talk]]) 16:49, 9 December 2018 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | :This current notice dates from 2010, but it is likely that other notices were present prior to that--copyright concerns on wiki content has been a known issue since before Wikipedia launched in 2001. Even without obvious copyright notices, contributions to a wiki can reasonably be expected to be unencumbered. But debating wiki copyrights is a rather pointless academic exercise unless and until somebody actually has a complaint. If somebody were to complain, it would be fairly straight-forward to remedy the situation by removing content as necessary to comply with law. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :The variety of image-licensing options is a rather new addition--and most are quite reasonable for use on the wiki. The "Found somewhere" option is likely intended to catch (and initiate review of) questionable images, instead of forcing users to hide them under other licenses. Images which violate or appear to violate copyright are removed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I would suggest that the bottom-of-page copyright notice be amended to state "Content is available under GFDL & MIT unless otherwise stated." to reflect images may have different licensing.--[[User:Loci|Loci]] ([[User talk:Loci|talk]]) 21:59, 9 December 2018 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:59, 9 December 2018
Licensing
The message at the bottom of the df wiki says that all content is available under GFDL & MIT. I wonder if that is really true.
This copyright page showed up in 2010. I don't know when the warning below the edit box appeared. So what is the status of older contributions?
The status of images uploaded here is also in question, since the file upload screen allows all kinds of licensing options. This particular screenshot is licensed as "Found the image somewhere." Basically everything in the tileset repo lacks detailed licensing information. Despite that, people claim that they are public domain and safe to use in video game development.
What are your thoughts? VengefulDonut (talk) 16:49, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
- This current notice dates from 2010, but it is likely that other notices were present prior to that--copyright concerns on wiki content has been a known issue since before Wikipedia launched in 2001. Even without obvious copyright notices, contributions to a wiki can reasonably be expected to be unencumbered. But debating wiki copyrights is a rather pointless academic exercise unless and until somebody actually has a complaint. If somebody were to complain, it would be fairly straight-forward to remedy the situation by removing content as necessary to comply with law.
- The variety of image-licensing options is a rather new addition--and most are quite reasonable for use on the wiki. The "Found somewhere" option is likely intended to catch (and initiate review of) questionable images, instead of forcing users to hide them under other licenses. Images which violate or appear to violate copyright are removed.