- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "Dwarf Fortress Wiki:Request for Adminship/Bombcar"
GarrieIrons (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==Public Discussion== | ==Public Discussion== | ||
:Discuss things here, yay | :Discuss things here, yay | ||
| + | Bombcar, sorry but I'm not going to troll through your contribs to see the good outshining the bad. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Lots of contribs makes you a good editor - not an automatically good admin. where in all that, did you discuss, negotiate, reach agreement with other contributors? Where did you argue points of how a wiki is meant to work to get your change made... or even better, come around and see that the other change made more sense then change the flow of your work to support the newly adopted way that the article/series was headed? | ||
| + | <font face="FixedSys" color="#00FFFF">[[User:GarrieIrons|Gar]]</font>[[User Talk:GarrieIrons|rie]] 09:38, 23 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
==Votes== | ==Votes== | ||
===Support=== | ===Support=== | ||
Revision as of 09:38, 23 February 2010
Administrator Candidacy Questionnaire
Why would I be a good Administrator?
I have time, and am very good at minor edits and finding spam. I also have a thorough knowledge of MediaWiki, MySQL, and Linux (though those may not be as useful), and have Mac OS X experience. I spend almost every waking hour near a computer.
Supporting Evidence
- Special:Contributions/Bombcar.
- I added "The shoe is making a plaintive gesture." to Scamps.
- I point the following redirect domains:
Public Q&A
- Q: Example question from a user goes here. Make sure to sign it with --~~~~!
- A: Administrator candidate's answer goes here.
Public Discussion
- Discuss things here, yay
Bombcar, sorry but I'm not going to troll through your contribs to see the good outshining the bad.
Lots of contribs makes you a good editor - not an automatically good admin. where in all that, did you discuss, negotiate, reach agreement with other contributors? Where did you argue points of how a wiki is meant to work to get your change made... or even better, come around and see that the other change made more sense then change the flow of your work to support the newly adopted way that the article/series was headed? Garrie 09:38, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Votes
Support
- SUPPORT: Blah blah blah, signature
- STRONG SUPPORT: blah blah blah
Oppose
- OPPOSE: Blah blah blah, here's why, signature
Neutral
- NEUTRAL| blah blah blah here's why signature