- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "Dwarf Fortress Wiki:Quality"
(sorted by importance) |
m |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<p>'''{{#expr:({{#expr: ((({{PAGESINCAT:DF2010:Fine Quality Articles|R}} * 0) +({{PAGESINCAT:DF2010:Exceptional Quality Articles|R}} * 50) + ({{PAGESINCAT:DF2010:Masterwork Quality Articles|R}} * 100))/(({{PAGESINCAT:DF2010:Fine Quality Articles|R}} + {{PAGESINCAT:DF2010:Exceptional Quality Articles|R}} + {{PAGESINCAT:DF2010:Masterwork Quality Articles|R}})))}}) }} out of 100''' overall wiki [[Dwarf Fortress Wiki:Quality|quality]] rating <small>without rounding</small></p> | <p>'''{{#expr:({{#expr: ((({{PAGESINCAT:DF2010:Fine Quality Articles|R}} * 0) +({{PAGESINCAT:DF2010:Exceptional Quality Articles|R}} * 50) + ({{PAGESINCAT:DF2010:Masterwork Quality Articles|R}} * 100))/(({{PAGESINCAT:DF2010:Fine Quality Articles|R}} + {{PAGESINCAT:DF2010:Exceptional Quality Articles|R}} + {{PAGESINCAT:DF2010:Masterwork Quality Articles|R}})))}}) }} out of 100''' overall wiki [[Dwarf Fortress Wiki:Quality|quality]] rating <small>without rounding</small></p> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Unknown== | ||
| + | [[:Category:Unknown Quality Articles|Unknown Quality Articles]] have been tagged with a quality level not recognized by the wiki, whether accidentally (incorrect spelling or capitalization) or intentionally (to request that somebody else rate the article). | ||
| + | |||
| + | If you encounter these, please evaluate and rate them according to the criteria above. | ||
| + | |||
==Fine== | ==Fine== | ||
[[:Category:Fine Quality Articles|Fine Quality Articles]] have many of the following characteristics: | [[:Category:Fine Quality Articles|Fine Quality Articles]] have many of the following characteristics: | ||
| Line 45: | Line 51: | ||
To insert this template, type <nowiki>{{Quality|Masterwork}}</nowiki> anywhere in the page. | To insert this template, type <nowiki>{{Quality|Masterwork}}</nowiki> anywhere in the page. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
[[Category:Wikiprojects]] | [[Category:Wikiprojects]] | ||
Revision as of 13:46, 11 May 2010
Division by zero.% Fine articles (0)
Division by zero.% Exceptional articles (0)
Division by zero.% Masterwork articles (0)
0 Total rated articles
Expression error: Unexpected < operator. out of 100 overall wiki quality rating without rounding
Unknown
Unknown Quality Articles have been tagged with a quality level not recognized by the wiki, whether accidentally (incorrect spelling or capitalization) or intentionally (to request that somebody else rate the article).
If you encounter these, please evaluate and rate them according to the criteria above.
Fine
Fine Quality Articles have many of the following characteristics:
- May be a stub article
- Lacks information
- Has a substantial number of redlinks, very few links or no links at all
- Contains inaccurate information
- Contains information that needs to be verified
- Is not categorized
To insert this template, type {{Quality|Fine}} anywhere in the page.
Exceptional
Exceptional Quality Articles have ALL of the following characteristics:
- Is properly categorized
- Has a decent amount of information
- Has all appropriate templates
- DOES NOT have any pink text at the bottom of the Article Version template (these indicate some kind of problem; for details, view the Template:ArticleVersion page)
- Is properly/sufficiently linked to other articles
- Contains no inaccurate information
and most of the following characteristics:
- May contain some redlinks
- But most links are functional
- May have a small amount of information that needs to be verified
- Has multiple editors
To insert this template, type {{Quality|Exceptional}} anywhere in the page.
Masterwork
Masterwork Quality Articles are the best of the best. Masterwork quality articles have ALL of the following characteristics:
- Is comprehensive on the subject
- Contains no unverified information
- Has an appropriate number of outbound links
- No redlinks are present
- Links only contain links of type {{l|linkname}} except where a link to another namespace is required
- Is properly categorized
- The article has multiple editors
To insert this template, type {{Quality|Masterwork}} anywhere in the page.