v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Navbox"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(reply) |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:I'm ok with it for this template, but I feel {{tl|gamedata}} would be too wide (it's typically used for text that's at most 80-100 columns wide, although that's not a hard limit by any means). I'm not an expert on readability, but I know some people consider 100% "too wide" for some things, so maybe a maximum width for this template could still be good to have. In any case, you're welcome to experiment as far as I'm concerned. —[[User:Lethosor|<span style="color:#074">Lethosor</span>]] ([[User talk:Lethosor|<span style="color:#092">talk</span>]]) 05:13, 11 February 2022 (UTC) | :I'm ok with it for this template, but I feel {{tl|gamedata}} would be too wide (it's typically used for text that's at most 80-100 columns wide, although that's not a hard limit by any means). I'm not an expert on readability, but I know some people consider 100% "too wide" for some things, so maybe a maximum width for this template could still be good to have. In any case, you're welcome to experiment as far as I'm concerned. —[[User:Lethosor|<span style="color:#074">Lethosor</span>]] ([[User talk:Lethosor|<span style="color:#092">talk</span>]]) 05:13, 11 February 2022 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : I agree. Also not sure where 60% came from in the first place, seems like an arbitrary number which would result in markedly different results on 1366x768 and 2560x1440 res screens. Otherwise user experience is very subjective, you can't please everyone, hell I even have different preference based on what device I use! So in this i'd side with the wisdom of the crowd, if 100% width works for most on Wikipedia its good enough for us.--[[User:Jan|Jan]] ([[User talk:Jan|talk]]) 23:25, 11 February 2022 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:25, 11 February 2022
Full width
I propose increasing the navbox's width to extend from its current 60% page width to fully extending across the page, as it traditionally is on other wikis. I can help w/ readability issues due to compactness and reduce scrolling. The same change would be made to Template:Gamedata, likewise.
60% width example | |
|---|---|
| Group 1 |
List 1.0 · List 1.1 · List 1.2 · List 1.3 · List 1.4 · List 1.5 · List 1.6 · List 1.7 · List 1.8 · List 1.9 · List 1.10 · List 1.11 · List 1.12 · List 1.13 · List 1.14 · List 1.15 · List 1.16 · List 1.17 · List 1.18 · List 1.19 · List 1.20 · List 1.21 · List 1.22 · List 1.23 · List 1.24 · List 1.25 · List 1.26 · List 1.27 · List 1.28 · List 1.29 · List 1.30 |
100% width example | |
|---|---|
| Group 1 |
List 1.0 · List 1.1 · List 1.2 · List 1.3 · List 1.4 · List 1.5 · List 1.6 · List 1.7 · List 1.8 · List 1.9 · List 1.10 · List 1.11 · List 1.12 · List 1.13 · List 1.14 · List 1.15 · List 1.16 · List 1.17 · List 1.18 · List 1.19 · List 1.20 · List 1.21 · List 1.22 · List 1.23 · List 1.24 · List 1.25 · List 1.26 · List 1.27 · List 1.28 · List 1.29 · List 1.30 |
– Doorkeeper 04:53, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- I'm ok with it for this template, but I feel {{gamedata}} would be too wide (it's typically used for text that's at most 80-100 columns wide, although that's not a hard limit by any means). I'm not an expert on readability, but I know some people consider 100% "too wide" for some things, so maybe a maximum width for this template could still be good to have. In any case, you're welcome to experiment as far as I'm concerned. —Lethosor (talk) 05:13, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- I agree. Also not sure where 60% came from in the first place, seems like an arbitrary number which would result in markedly different results on 1366x768 and 2560x1440 res screens. Otherwise user experience is very subjective, you can't please everyone, hell I even have different preference based on what device I use! So in this i'd side with the wisdom of the crowd, if 100% width works for most on Wikipedia its good enough for us.--Jan (talk) 23:25, 11 February 2022 (UTC)