v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
  • v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
  • Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.

Difference between revisions of "User talk:N9103"

From Dwarf Fortress Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 7: Line 7:
 
== Comments/Opinions/Rants Welcome Here ==
 
== Comments/Opinions/Rants Welcome Here ==
  
:I need help promoting my new [[User:Frostedfire|User page]].  Atm has the adventures of my hammerdwarf, bashing jaguars, grizzlies, a wolf pack, stoning longnose gar and carp, those same carp coming after me and freezing in the river overnight, some [[goblins|grots]] getting knocked around, and my final demise at the hands of a grot with a fetish for S&M.  He was nice in a way, he did hand me a ball-gag before the lashings began.  I needs help getting it popular enough to get it on the main page, along with the planned fortress tutorial ;)  --[[User:Frostedfire|Frostedfire]] 07:26, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
+
I need help promoting my new [[User:Frostedfire|User page]].  Atm has the adventures of my hammerdwarf, bashing jaguars, grizzlies, a wolf pack, stoning longnose gar and carp, those same carp coming after me and freezing in the river overnight, some [[goblins|grots]] getting knocked around, and my final demise at the hands of a grot with a fetish for S&M.  He was nice in a way, he did hand me a ball-gag before the lashings began.  I needs help getting it popular enough to get it on the main page, along with the planned fortress tutorial ;)  --[[User:Frostedfire|Frostedfire]] 07:26, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
<br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
  
== Problems/Mistakes/Corrections ==
+
:Improve quality, not popularity. This wiki is small - everyone is at least a Passing Acquaintance with everyone else. --[[User:Savok|Savok]] 09:02, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Problems/mistakes/corrections ==
 
<small>Forgive me for the occasional slip up. Just make a note here of where I managed to screw up, so that I may endeavor to learn from my mistakes.--[[User:N9103|N9103]] 15:54, 23 December 2007 (EST)</small><br>
 
<small>Forgive me for the occasional slip up. Just make a note here of where I managed to screw up, so that I may endeavor to learn from my mistakes.--[[User:N9103|N9103]] 15:54, 23 December 2007 (EST)</small><br>
<br>
 
<br>
 
  
 
Nothing too troublesome, but on the system reqs page you made a somewhat false statement in that you said that a dedicated single core was faster then a dual core- while I understand where this comes from, all of Intels Core2 line are more powerful on even a single core then their entire P4 line including the 3.4 GHz prescott. AMD's are likely the same though I cannot know for sure. Also, two processors with the exact same specs in terms of speed, ect ect, the dual will still win due to larger Cache and the ability to run excess processes on a seperate core. --[[User:Darkone|Darkone]] 20:42, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
 
Nothing too troublesome, but on the system reqs page you made a somewhat false statement in that you said that a dedicated single core was faster then a dual core- while I understand where this comes from, all of Intels Core2 line are more powerful on even a single core then their entire P4 line including the 3.4 GHz prescott. AMD's are likely the same though I cannot know for sure. Also, two processors with the exact same specs in terms of speed, ect ect, the dual will still win due to larger Cache and the ability to run excess processes on a seperate core. --[[User:Darkone|Darkone]] 20:42, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
  
:Being that I don't have a single core comparable to my current dual core, I'll take your word on this matter, though I disagree, to the extent that it matters.
+
:Being that I don't have a single core comparable to my current dual core, I'll take your word on this matter, though I disagree, to the extent that it matters. --[[User:N9103|N9103]]
 +
 
 +
::Try to sign your posts, even on your own talk page. --[[User:Savok|Savok]] 09:02, 3 June 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 13:02, 3 June 2008

Persona Grata

VengefulDonut - Bad Edit Finder
GarrieIrons - Formatting Helper
Fedor - PreGen Enthusiast ;)

Comments/Opinions/Rants Welcome Here

I need help promoting my new User page. Atm has the adventures of my hammerdwarf, bashing jaguars, grizzlies, a wolf pack, stoning longnose gar and carp, those same carp coming after me and freezing in the river overnight, some grots getting knocked around, and my final demise at the hands of a grot with a fetish for S&M. He was nice in a way, he did hand me a ball-gag before the lashings began. I needs help getting it popular enough to get it on the main page, along with the planned fortress tutorial ;) --Frostedfire 07:26, 3 June 2008 (EDT)

Improve quality, not popularity. This wiki is small - everyone is at least a Passing Acquaintance with everyone else. --Savok 09:02, 3 June 2008 (EDT)

Problems/mistakes/corrections

Forgive me for the occasional slip up. Just make a note here of where I managed to screw up, so that I may endeavor to learn from my mistakes.--N9103 15:54, 23 December 2007 (EST)

Nothing too troublesome, but on the system reqs page you made a somewhat false statement in that you said that a dedicated single core was faster then a dual core- while I understand where this comes from, all of Intels Core2 line are more powerful on even a single core then their entire P4 line including the 3.4 GHz prescott. AMD's are likely the same though I cannot know for sure. Also, two processors with the exact same specs in terms of speed, ect ect, the dual will still win due to larger Cache and the ability to run excess processes on a seperate core. --Darkone 20:42, 12 May 2008 (EDT)

Being that I don't have a single core comparable to my current dual core, I'll take your word on this matter, though I disagree, to the extent that it matters. --N9103
Try to sign your posts, even on your own talk page. --Savok 09:02, 3 June 2008 (EDT)