Difference between revisions of "User talk:N9103"

Revision as of 15:46, 7 June 2008

VengefulDonut - Bad Edit Finder
GarrieIrons - Formatting Helper
Fedor - PreGen Enthusiast ;)

Forgive me for the occasional slip up. Just make a note here of where I managed to screw up, so that I may endeavor to learn from my mistakes.

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 == Problems/mistakes/corrections ==
-<small>Forgive me for the occasional slip up. Just make a note here of where I managed to screw up, so that I may endeavor to learn from my mistakes.--[[User:N9103|N9103]] 15:54, 23 December 2007 (EST)</small><br>
+<small>Forgive me for the occasional slip up. Just make a note here of where I managed to screw up, so that I may endeavor to learn from my mistakes.</small><br>
-Nothing too troublesome, but on the system reqs page you made a somewhat false statement in that you said that a dedicated single core was faster then a dual core- while I understand where this comes from, all of Intels Core2 line are more powerful on even a single core then their entire P4 line including the 3.4 GHz prescott. AMD's are likely the same though I cannot know for sure. Also, two processors with the exact same specs in terms of speed, ect ect, the dual will still win due to larger Cache and the ability to run excess processes on a seperate core. --[[User:Darkone|Darkone]] 20:42, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
-:Being that I don't have a single core comparable to my current dual core, I'll take your word on this matter, though I disagree, to the extent that it matters. --[[User:N9103|N9103]]
-::Try to sign your posts, even on your own talk page. --[[User:Savok|Savok]] 09:02, 3 June 2008 (EDT)