Ethic

xTATTEREDx  · +FINE+  · *SUPERIOR*  · ≡EXCEPTIONAL≡  · ☼MASTERWORK☼

v50.14 · v0.47.05 This article is about the current version of DF. Note that some content may still need to be updated. More Info · V

Ethics tags are used in the entity raw files to determine how different civilizations feel about various issues. Relationships between civilizations are based on their ethic responses in relation to each other; similar ethics result in friendship, while conflicting ethics result in animosity. Strongly conflicting ethics often trigger wars during world generation.

In practice, this generally causes elves to declare war on everybody else over killing plants and making trophies, and everybody else to declare war on the elves over the devouring of sapient beings.

Some ethics also affect fortress mode features such as justice or trading. In adventurer mode, ethics can affect the level of combat (lethal, or no quarter). During world generation, ethics also affect how the entity treats its kills, such as devouring them or making trophies out of them.

Ethics types

Token	Extra Information
ASSAULT	The result of a tantruming citizen attacking another in fortress mode. Other effects unknown.
EAT_SAPIENT_KILL	This determines if the race will sometimes devour dead enemy combatants.
EAT_SAPIENT_OTHER	This also determines whatever or not a race is willing to butcher other sapients.
KILL_ANIMAL	A response between MISGUIDED and UNTHINKABLE (see below) causes the entity to refuse animal products in trade — namely, materials with [IMPLIES_ANIMAL_KILL].
KILL_ENEMY	If REQUIRED, all lethal combat with an enemy who is an enemy of the whole entity will put the creature in no quarter mode.
KILL_ENTITY_MEMBER	If REQUIRED, all lethal combat with an enemy in the same entity will put the creature in no quarter mode.
KILL_NEUTRAL	If REQUIRED, all lethal combat with an enemy who is neutral with the entity will put the creature in no quarter mode.
KILL_PLANT	This determines a race's position towards wood as well — a response between MISGUIDED and UNTHINKABLE (see below) causes the entity to refuse wooden objects (except for "grown" wooden objects) in trade, and it also prohibits them from bringing caravan wagons.
LYING
MAKE_TROPHY_ANIMAL
MAKE_TROPHY_SAME_RACE
MAKE_TROPHY_SAPIENT
OATH_BREAKING	The result of a citizen violating noble mandates in fortress mode. Other effects unknown.
SLAVERY
THEFT	This determines whether the race will try to steal goods.
TORTURE_ANIMALS
TORTURE_AS_EXAMPLE
TORTURE_FOR_FUN
TORTURE_FOR_INFORMATION
TREASON
TRESPASSING
VANDALISM	The result of a tantruming citizen breaking furniture in fortress mode. Other effects unknown.

Ethics values

As used internally (see below), roughly in order of acceptability:

Num	Token
0	NOT_APPLICABLE
1	ACCEPTABLE
2	PERSONAL_MATTER
3	JUSTIFIED_IF_NO_REPERCUSSIONS
4	JUSTIFIED_IF_GOOD_REASON
5	JUSTIFIED_IF_EXTREME_REASON
6	JUSTIFIED_IF_SELF_DEFENSE
7	ONLY_IF_SANCTIONED
8	MISGUIDED
9	SHUN
10	APPALLING
11	PUNISH_REPRIMAND
12	PUNISH_SERIOUS
13	PUNISH_EXILE
14	PUNISH_CAPITAL
15	UNTHINKABLE
16	REQUIRED

Ethics value numbers in relation to each other

The following table describes how entities respond to other cultures, with the observer on the vertical axis and their target on the horizontal axis. If an entity's accumulated animosity towards another passes a certain threshold (determined by ruler's personality) then it will run a risk-assessment check. If passed, this will lead to a declaration of war.

In general, entities react much more strongly to actions that violate their taboos than to the outlawing of their customs in other civilisations. For example, Civ A finds slavery Acceptable, but Civ B considers it a Capital Offence.

• Civ A will consider Civ B most unreasonable (−5) for executing people over such a non-issue.
• Civ B will be shocked and disgusted (−15) that Civ A engages in such a debased activity.
• The end result is mutual negativity. However, Civ B is 3× more offended, and much more likely to go to war over the issue — assuming, of course, they think they have a chance of winning.

		TARGET
		Accept.	Personal	Reperc.	Good	Extreme	Self-Def.	Sanctioned	Misguided	Shun	Appalling	Reprimand	Serious	Exile	Capital	Unthinkable	Required
OBSERVER	Acceptable	+1	+1	+1	0	0	0	0	−1	−2	−2	−2	−3	−5	−5	−2	+1
	Personal	+1	+1	+1	0	0	0	0	−1	−2	−2	−2	−3	−5	−5	−2	+1
	No Reperc.	+1	+1	+1	0	0	0	0	−1	−2	−2	−2	−3	−5	−5	−2	+1
	Good Reas.	0	0	0	+2	+1	0	0	0	−1	−1	−1	−1	−1	−1	−1	0
	Extreme Rs.	−1	−1	0	+1	+2	0	0	0	−1	−1	−1	−1	−1	−1	−1	−1
	Self-Defence	−2	−2	−1	0	+1	+2	0	0	0	−1	−1	−1	−1	−1	−1	−2
	Sanctioned	−2	−2	−1	0	+1	0	+2	0	0	−1	−1	−1	−1	−1	−1	−2
	Misguided	−1	−1	0	0	0	0	0	+2	+1	+1	+1	0	0	−1	+1	−1
	Shun	−1	−1	0	0	0	0	0	+1	+2	+1	+1	0	0	−1	+1	−1
	Appalling	−5	−5	−3	−2	−1	−1	−2	+1	+1	+2	+1	+1	+1	0	+1	−5
	Reprimand	−5	−5	−3	−2	−1	−1	−2	+1	+1	+1	+2	+1	+1	0	+1	−5
	Serious	−10	−10	−7	−3	−2	−2	−3	0	+1	+1	0	+2	+1	+1	+1	−10
	Exile	−10	−10	−7	−3	−2	−2	−3	0	+1	+1	0	+1	+2	+1	+1	−10
	Capital	−15	−15	−10	−5	−3	−3	−5	0	0	+1	0	+1	+1	+2	+1	−15
	Unthinkable	−15	−15	−10	−5	−3	−3	−5	0	+1	+1	0	+1	+1	+1	+2	−15
	Required	+1	+1	+1	0	0	0	0	−1	−2	−2	−2	−3	−5	−5	−2	+1

All above info was collected and interpreted from the data given by Toady himself at [1].