v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "40d Talk:Metal industry"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→One term to rule them all, one term to bind them...: not forgetting coal bars :)) |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
::Can I address them? As you say, not until Toady does. "Carbon-based reaction component"? "High-carbon-content multi-purpose material"? Yet another unsatisfactory term? We've been dealt 6 bad cards, and ''have'' to play one of them. In the main article, "fuel" was the one I chose to act as the umbrella term, the least of the evils imo. And while "fuel" is not being "burnt" in the steel-related reactions, the substance is identical - and ~is~ the default term commonly used on the forums. That's where I learned it, that's what's used, not any of the more complex/confusing ones. I use "starter fluid" to clean my carburetor - not trying to start the car, but it's still called starting fluid, not "carburetor cleaner" (unless bought as that, then you pay twice as much!) Same with "nail polish remover" and "acetone" - and we've got a similar situation here. The fact that we're doing it consciously rather than by social linguistic evolution just makes it feel more awkward. (And I guess that's why I felt it needed more than a throw-away comment.) --[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 16:40, 13 June 2009 (UTC) | ::Can I address them? As you say, not until Toady does. "Carbon-based reaction component"? "High-carbon-content multi-purpose material"? Yet another unsatisfactory term? We've been dealt 6 bad cards, and ''have'' to play one of them. In the main article, "fuel" was the one I chose to act as the umbrella term, the least of the evils imo. And while "fuel" is not being "burnt" in the steel-related reactions, the substance is identical - and ~is~ the default term commonly used on the forums. That's where I learned it, that's what's used, not any of the more complex/confusing ones. I use "starter fluid" to clean my carburetor - not trying to start the car, but it's still called starting fluid, not "carburetor cleaner" (unless bought as that, then you pay twice as much!) Same with "nail polish remover" and "acetone" - and we've got a similar situation here. The fact that we're doing it consciously rather than by social linguistic evolution just makes it feel more awkward. (And I guess that's why I felt it needed more than a throw-away comment.) --[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 16:40, 13 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Not to clear up the confusion at all, but in the 2D wiki it was "coal bars". You refined them from coal ore, keeping the ore->bars rule. "Coke" was the real-world term. It is purified carbon, in the end. --[[User:Jellyfishgreen|Jellyfishgreen]] 21:37, 13 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:37, 13 June 2009
For now, how about we redirect this page to metalsmith forge? --Nightwind 04:09, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- I think a lot of what is at metalsmith forge really belongs here. I am trying to sort something out similar to clothing industry; I will have a good look at what is in that page vs what is at Clothier's shop and do something much the same for this page and metalsmith's forge.GarrieIrons 03:22, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- G has it right - there are several other "X Industry" type pages, this should be roughly modeled on those. We're trying to move away from having pages do double duty simply because we have no better place to put the info - there's enough info that can go into this that it will fill its own article. I also think that graphic could get reworked and cleaned up, made more clear and legible, and complete - like adding flux for one, and the 4 fuel options, and perhaps re-ordering (alphabetizing?) the materials at the top. --Albedo 06:32, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. I have noticed that "power" pretty much refers to wind or water power, not "heat energy" so there is a section here that needs re-titling; the metal industry needs heat energy either from wood, "coal" (various types) or magma. GarrieIrons 14:15, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- G has it right - there are several other "X Industry" type pages, this should be roughly modeled on those. We're trying to move away from having pages do double duty simply because we have no better place to put the info - there's enough info that can go into this that it will fill its own article. I also think that graphic could get reworked and cleaned up, made more clear and legible, and complete - like adding flux for one, and the 4 fuel options, and perhaps re-ordering (alphabetizing?) the materials at the top. --Albedo 06:32, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
One term to rule them all, one term to bind them...
replaced ("fuel") with refined coal - which is what is needed at a magma smelter.
The event cancel message says "Needs refined coal"
Well, the cancel message says that. However, if you try to queue up a task and have no fuel, you get the message "Must have coal fuel". (See Refined_coal#In-game_usage). And now your find in stockpiles - coal. Let's face it - this sucks. We have 6 terms that refer to one in-game material - coal fuel, refined coal, coal, charcoal, coke, and the out-of-game term "fuel" (and that doesn't count bituminous coal, which adds to the headache). Personally, I like "fuel" because it is clear, distinct, generic, and non-confusing for a newbie. If they hit the link, they go to the Refined coal page, and dive into the confusion and get over it like we all had to.
I'd like to see "fuel" get used consistently unless referring to a specific in-game context. (I'd rather use in-game terms exclusively - but there are 5 1/2 of them!) If we use 1 in-game term over another, that will just create newbie confusion - it certainly did for me when I started out. I expressed these thoughts when I re-wrote the Refined Coal article after consulting with several wiki vets. Talk:Refined_coal#Rewrite_-_.26_.22fuel.22--Albedo 16:27, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- all-right, having said all that.
- Can you now address the contradictions? It says "Magma versions only require an open floor below them". Try making iron without "refined coal". YOU CAN'T. But it isn't there as a fuel, it is there to react with the oxygen in the ferrous oxide, make CO2 and leave behind iron.
- Honestly: the wiki won't make sense on this issue till toady gets rid of in-game contradictory terminology. I'm sure it's "on the list".GarrieIrons 07:57, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Can I address them? As you say, not until Toady does. "Carbon-based reaction component"? "High-carbon-content multi-purpose material"? Yet another unsatisfactory term? We've been dealt 6 bad cards, and have to play one of them. In the main article, "fuel" was the one I chose to act as the umbrella term, the least of the evils imo. And while "fuel" is not being "burnt" in the steel-related reactions, the substance is identical - and ~is~ the default term commonly used on the forums. That's where I learned it, that's what's used, not any of the more complex/confusing ones. I use "starter fluid" to clean my carburetor - not trying to start the car, but it's still called starting fluid, not "carburetor cleaner" (unless bought as that, then you pay twice as much!) Same with "nail polish remover" and "acetone" - and we've got a similar situation here. The fact that we're doing it consciously rather than by social linguistic evolution just makes it feel more awkward. (And I guess that's why I felt it needed more than a throw-away comment.) --Albedo 16:40, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Not to clear up the confusion at all, but in the 2D wiki it was "coal bars". You refined them from coal ore, keeping the ore->bars rule. "Coke" was the real-world term. It is purified carbon, in the end. --Jellyfishgreen 21:37, 13 June 2009 (UTC)