Editing Talk:Labor

== Specialized vs unspecialized when assigned to workshop ==
I marked the cell ["The dwarf is assigned to the workshop or occupation giving this job" / Unspecialized] as blank, but Putnam changed it to green. That doesn't match my testing.

Figure I'll just share my [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_wDaW4WhUBajfFobpMPQQAE6E0gBUBhwPaTNInuKPe0/edit?usp=sharing test notes here], I'll add to it if there's other disagreements.
If a job is not permitted to be assigned to a dwarf via the labors system, they will still take a job in an assigned workshop only ''if they are specialized'' based on my testing. I'll change the cell back for now, but let's get consensus here if there's still disagreement. [[User:OddballJoe|OddballJoe]] ([[User talk:OddballJoe|talk]]) 20:59, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 Figure I'll just share my [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_wDaW4WhUBajfFobpMPQQAE6E0gBUBhwPaTNInuKPe0/edit?usp=sharing test notes here], I'll add to it if there's other disagreements.
 If a job is not permitted to be assigned to a dwarf via the labors system, they will still take a job in an assigned workshop only ''if they are specialized'' based on my testing. I'll change the cell back for now, but let's get consensus here if there's still disagreement. [[User:OddballJoe|OddballJoe]] ([[User talk:OddballJoe|talk]]) 20:59, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
-== Red vs blank squares in labor table ==
-Putnam, you changed the blank squares to red "No" squares. My thinking in leaving them blank was to make the top statement about "any condition" more obvious; I think if people see that both a "No" and a "Yes" condition are satisfied, it'll be harder to interpret than if they see a "Yes" condition and a blank condition satisfied. Do you disagree? [[User:OddballJoe|OddballJoe]] ([[User talk:OddballJoe|talk]]) 21:06, 8 January 2023 (UTC)