v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Ral"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | ==Reclaim== | |
| − | + | Are you planning on renaming the corresponding pages in the 40d and 23a namespaces? --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 21:11, 2 May 2011 (UTC) | |
| − | + | :No, I wasn't. Is that bad? --[[User:Ral|Ral]] 21:42, 2 May 2011 (UTC) | |
| − | + | ::By renaming the page in one namespace, the inter-version links no longer work (and the new one also lacks a redirect from the global namespace) - thus, the answer is "yes, that's bad". --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 23:46, 2 May 2011 (UTC) | |
| − | + | :::Ok, I moved it back. I seem to have not figured out the whole namespace linking thing yet.... I also changed links so you can delete the redirect at [[DF2010:Fortress mode]] if you want. --[[User:Ral|Ral]] 00:23, 3 May 2011 (UTC) | |
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 00:23, 3 May 2011
Reclaim[edit]
Are you planning on renaming the corresponding pages in the 40d and 23a namespaces? --Quietust 21:11, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- No, I wasn't. Is that bad? --Ral 21:42, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- By renaming the page in one namespace, the inter-version links no longer work (and the new one also lacks a redirect from the global namespace) - thus, the answer is "yes, that's bad". --Quietust 23:46, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, I moved it back. I seem to have not figured out the whole namespace linking thing yet.... I also changed links so you can delete the redirect at DF2010:Fortress mode if you want. --Ral 00:23, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
- By renaming the page in one namespace, the inter-version links no longer work (and the new one also lacks a redirect from the global namespace) - thus, the answer is "yes, that's bad". --Quietust 23:46, 2 May 2011 (UTC)