v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
  • v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
  • Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.

v0.31 Talk:Experience

From Dwarf Fortress Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Legendary +1...

Do we have any proof - or even any hint - that these still exist?--Albedo 21:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Only in the sense that they *used to* exist. I left it on the table; if someone else is braver than I, they can remove it until such time as they are proved to exist and matter. 129.2.164.85
At least in adventure mode it is possible to have a higher level than 500. I had a wrestler and fighter skill of about [*****/50000], which would be a level of (50000/100(for the experience))-5(for starting experience) which is about level 495. I got this by wrestling a bronze titancolossus after I dropped him into a murky pool. I have still a pic of THAT but not of the experience. I haven't modded the game nor used cheats/hacks. I try to redo that (deleted the save) and make PICS! Not needed you can use the battle arena to do this. Just make a bronze colossus in the water and another creature on the ground above the water. Then attack/wrestle it. You easy get a very high wrestling skill since EVERY attack of wrestling increases wrestling and fighter about 5000-30000 points.

On this topic, I have evidence (if not proof) that Legendary +1 (etc.) exist. I have two miners, both legendary, but one of whom has been mining for a quite a bit longer, and mines appreciably faster (50% faster or so). So, there could be other factors at work here, but the obvious answer is Legendary+1. Rodya mirov

Whatever Dwarf Therapist uses for it seems to think so because it's still listed as legandard +x. Mason (T-C) 18:53, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Experience amounts

The experience amounts listed in this table are wrong. They are not 1..2..3.. etc. They are the same as the 40d table. Garanis 02:38, 10 April 2010 (UTC)