v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
  • v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
  • Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.

Difference between revisions of "Dwarf Fortress Wiki:Quality"

From Dwarf Fortress Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(add purge link)
(Undo revision 293304 by 193.146.86.29 (talk) Removed vandalism)
Tag: Undo
 
(22 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
{{Main page progress bar|DF2012}}
+
{{Main page progress bar|DF2014}}
 +
<br />
 +
{{Main page progress bar|v0.34}}
 
<br />
 
<br />
 
{{Main page progress bar|v0.31}}
 
{{Main page progress bar|v0.31}}
Line 7: Line 9:
 
{{Main page progress bar|23a}}
 
{{Main page progress bar|23a}}
 
<br />
 
<br />
−
<p class="plainlinks">To update these progress bars, [{{fullurl:DF:Q|action=purge}} click here]</p>
+
{{Main page progress bar|Masterwork}}
 +
<br />
 +
{{Main page progress bar|Utility}}
 +
<p class="plainlinks">To update these progress bars, [{{fullurl:DF:Quality|action=purge}} click here]</p>
 
{| style="width:100%"
 
{| style="width:100%"
−
| || '''''{{current/version}}''''' || '''0.31.25''' || '''0.28.181.40d''' || '''0.23.130.23a'''
+
| || '''''[[Main Page|{{current/version}}]]''''' || '''[[v0.34:Main Page|0.34.11]]''' || '''[[v0.31:Main Page|0.31.25]]''' || '''[[40d:Main Page|0.28.181.40d]]''' || '''[[23a:Main Page|0.23.130.23a]]'''
 
|-
 
|-
 
| [[#Tattered|Tattered]]
 
| [[#Tattered|Tattered]]
−
| '''{{DF:Quality/percent|DF2012|Tattered}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:DF2012:Tattered Quality Articles|R}})'''
+
| '''{{DF:Quality/percent|DF2014|Tattered}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:DF2014:Tattered Quality Articles|R}})'''
 +
| {{DF:Quality/percent|v0.34|Tattered}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:v0.34:Tattered Quality Articles|R}})
 
| {{DF:Quality/percent|v0.31|Tattered}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:v0.31:Tattered Quality Articles|R}})
 
| {{DF:Quality/percent|v0.31|Tattered}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:v0.31:Tattered Quality Articles|R}})
 
| {{DF:Quality/percent|40d|Tattered}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:40d:Tattered Quality Articles|R}})
 
| {{DF:Quality/percent|40d|Tattered}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:40d:Tattered Quality Articles|R}})
Line 18: Line 24:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| [[#Fine|Fine]]
 
| [[#Fine|Fine]]
−
| '''{{DF:Quality/percent|DF2012|Fine}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:DF2012:Fine Quality Articles|R}})'''
+
| '''{{DF:Quality/percent|DF2014|Fine}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:DF2014:Fine Quality Articles|R}})'''
 +
| {{DF:Quality/percent|v0.34|Fine}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:v0.34:Fine Quality Articles|R}})
 
| {{DF:Quality/percent|v0.31|Fine}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:v0.31:Fine Quality Articles|R}})
 
| {{DF:Quality/percent|v0.31|Fine}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:v0.31:Fine Quality Articles|R}})
 
| {{DF:Quality/percent|40d|Fine}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:40d:Fine Quality Articles|R}})
 
| {{DF:Quality/percent|40d|Fine}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:40d:Fine Quality Articles|R}})
 
| {{DF:Quality/percent|23a|Fine}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:23a:Fine Quality Articles|R}})
 
| {{DF:Quality/percent|23a|Fine}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:23a:Fine Quality Articles|R}})
 +
|-
 +
| [[#Superior|Superior]]
 +
| '''{{DF:Quality/percent|DF2014|Superior}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:DF2014:Superior Quality Articles|R}})'''
 +
| {{DF:Quality/percent|v0.34|Superior}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:v0.34:Superior Quality Articles|R}})
 +
| {{DF:Quality/percent|v0.31|Superior}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:v0.31:Superior Quality Articles|R}})
 +
| {{DF:Quality/percent|40d|Superior}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:40d:Superior Quality Articles|R}})
 +
| {{DF:Quality/percent|23a|Superior}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:23a:Superior Quality Articles|R}})
 
|-
 
|-
 
| [[#Exceptional|Exceptional]]
 
| [[#Exceptional|Exceptional]]
−
| '''{{DF:Quality/percent|DF2012|Exceptional}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:DF2012:Exceptional Quality Articles|R}})'''
+
| '''{{DF:Quality/percent|DF2014|Exceptional}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:DF2014:Exceptional Quality Articles|R}})'''
 +
| {{DF:Quality/percent|v0.34|Exceptional}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:v0.34:Exceptional Quality Articles|R}})
 
| {{DF:Quality/percent|v0.31|Exceptional}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:v0.31:Exceptional Quality Articles|R}})
 
| {{DF:Quality/percent|v0.31|Exceptional}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:v0.31:Exceptional Quality Articles|R}})
 
| {{DF:Quality/percent|40d|Exceptional}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:40d:Exceptional Quality Articles|R}})
 
| {{DF:Quality/percent|40d|Exceptional}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:40d:Exceptional Quality Articles|R}})
Line 30: Line 45:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| [[#Masterwork|Masterwork]]
 
| [[#Masterwork|Masterwork]]
−
| '''{{DF:Quality/percent|DF2012|Masterwork}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:DF2012:Masterwork Quality Articles|R}})'''
+
| '''{{DF:Quality/percent|DF2014|Masterwork}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:DF2014:Masterwork Quality Articles|R}})'''
 +
| {{DF:Quality/percent|v0.34|Masterwork}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:v0.34:Masterwork Quality Articles|R}})
 
| {{DF:Quality/percent|v0.31|Masterwork}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:v0.31:Masterwork Quality Articles|R}})
 
| {{DF:Quality/percent|v0.31|Masterwork}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:v0.31:Masterwork Quality Articles|R}})
 
| {{DF:Quality/percent|40d|Masterwork}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:40d:Masterwork Quality Articles|R}})
 
| {{DF:Quality/percent|40d|Masterwork}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:40d:Masterwork Quality Articles|R}})
Line 36: Line 52:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| '''[[#Unknown|Unknown]]'''
 
| '''[[#Unknown|Unknown]]'''
−
| '''{{PAGESINCAT:DF2012:Unknown Quality Articles|R}}'''
+
| '''{{PAGESINCAT:DF2014:Unknown Quality Articles|R}}'''
 +
| '''{{PAGESINCAT:v0.34:Unknown Quality Articles|R}}'''
 
| '''{{PAGESINCAT:v0.31:Unknown Quality Articles|R}}'''
 
| '''{{PAGESINCAT:v0.31:Unknown Quality Articles|R}}'''
 
| '''{{PAGESINCAT:40d:Unknown Quality Articles|R}}'''
 
| '''{{PAGESINCAT:40d:Unknown Quality Articles|R}}'''
Line 42: Line 59:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Total
 
| Total
−
| '''{{NUMBEROFARTICLES|DF2012}}'''
+
| '''{{NUMBEROFARTICLES|DF2014}}'''
 +
| {{NUMBEROFARTICLES|v0.34}}
 
| {{NUMBEROFARTICLES|v0.31}}
 
| {{NUMBEROFARTICLES|v0.31}}
 
| {{NUMBEROFARTICLES|40d}}
 
| {{NUMBEROFARTICLES|40d}}
Line 48: Line 66:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Rating
 
| Rating
−
| '''{{DF:Quality/rating|DF2012}} out of 100'''
+
| '''{{DF:Quality/rating|DF2014}} out of 100'''
 +
| '''{{DF:Quality/rating|v0.34}} out of 100'''
 
| '''{{DF:Quality/rating|v0.31}} out of 100'''
 
| '''{{DF:Quality/rating|v0.31}} out of 100'''
 
| '''{{DF:Quality/rating|40d}} out of 100'''
 
| '''{{DF:Quality/rating|40d}} out of 100'''
 
| '''{{DF:Quality/rating|23a}} out of 100'''
 
| '''{{DF:Quality/rating|23a}} out of 100'''
 
|}
 
|}
 +
 +
{| style="width: 33%"
 +
| || '''[[Masterwork:Main Page|Masterwork]]'''
 +
|-
 +
| [[#Tattered|Tattered]]
 +
| {{DF:Quality/percent|Masterwork|Tattered}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:Masterwork:Tattered Quality Articles|R}})
 +
|-
 +
| [[#Fine|Fine]]
 +
| {{DF:Quality/percent|Masterwork|Fine}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:Masterwork:Fine Quality Articles|R}})
 +
|-
 +
| [[#Superior|Superior]]
 +
| {{DF:Quality/percent|Masterwork|Superior}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:Masterwork:Superior Quality Articles|R}})
 +
|-
 +
| [[#Exceptional|Exceptional]]
 +
| {{DF:Quality/percent|Masterwork|Exceptional}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:Masterwork:Exceptional Quality Articles|R}})
 +
|-
 +
| [[#Masterwork|Masterwork]]
 +
| {{DF:Quality/percent|Masterwork|Masterwork}}% ({{PAGESINCAT:Masterwork:Masterwork Quality Articles|R}})
 +
|-
 +
| '''[[#Unknown|Unknown]]'''
 +
| '''{{PAGESINCAT:Masterwork:Unknown Quality Articles|R}}'''
 +
|-
 +
| Total
 +
| {{NUMBEROFARTICLES|Masterwork}}
 +
|-
 +
| Rating
 +
| '''{{DF:Quality/rating|Masterwork}} out of 100'''
 +
|}
 +
  
 
{{Shortcut|DF:Q}}
 
{{Shortcut|DF:Q}}
−
==Quality Template Problems==
 
−
Quality templates should include a timestamp to let us gauge how old a rating is. Quality ratings that do not have proper timestamps are in  [[:Category:Quality ranks without proper timestamps]]. Quality templates that were placed more than 10 weeks ago (and thus should be re-ranked) are in [[:Category:Quality ranks older than 10 weeks]].
 
  
 
==Ratings==
 
==Ratings==
 
In order to rate articles, click the "rate" tab when on the page you wish to rank, then fill out the form in order to suggest an appropriate rating. If you feel the suggested rating is incorrect, you may override it and force a specific rating.
 
In order to rate articles, click the "rate" tab when on the page you wish to rank, then fill out the form in order to suggest an appropriate rating. If you feel the suggested rating is incorrect, you may override it and force a specific rating.
  
−
There are 4 official ratings (plus an additional "unknown" for any manually applied ratings which do not match), all described below.
+
There are 5 official ratings (plus an additional "unknown" for any manually applied ratings which do not match), all described below.
  
 
===Unknown===
 
===Unknown===
 
[[:Category:Unknown Quality Articles|Unknown Quality Articles]] have been tagged with a quality level not recognized by the wiki, whether accidentally (incorrect spelling or capitalization) or intentionally (to request that somebody else rate the article).
 
[[:Category:Unknown Quality Articles|Unknown Quality Articles]] have been tagged with a quality level not recognized by the wiki, whether accidentally (incorrect spelling or capitalization) or intentionally (to request that somebody else rate the article).
  
−
If you encounter these, please evaluate and rate them according to the criteria below.
+
If you encounter these, please evaluate and rate them according to the criteria below. Note that in some cases, a page may get an error when attempting to give them a proper rating, such as a "template loop" error.
  
 
===Tattered===
 
===Tattered===
Line 82: Line 128:
 
* Contains little to no inaccurate information
 
* Contains little to no inaccurate information
 
* Contains some information that needs to be verified
 
* Contains some information that needs to be verified
 +
Pages which are entirely auto-generated from the raws should be rated Fine.
 +
 +
===Superior===
 +
[[:Category:Superior Quality Articles|Superior Quality Articles]] have most of the following characteristics:
 +
* No important information is missing (includes templates/infoboxes, obvious facts, etc.)
 +
** May be missing some less-important information
 +
* Has a sufficient number of links
 +
* Has very few red links
 +
* Includes all standard templates
 +
** Templates are completed when necessary (including butchering returns for creatures, labors for workshops, etc.)
 +
* Is properly categorized
  
 
===Exceptional===
 
===Exceptional===
Line 102: Line 159:
 
* Article is aesthetically pleasing
 
* Article is aesthetically pleasing
 
* Is properly categorized
 
* Is properly categorized
−
* The article has multiple editors
+
* Has multiple editors
  
 
[[Category:Wikiprojects]]
 
[[Category:Wikiprojects]]

Latest revision as of 09:07, 15 May 2023







To update these progress bars, click here

50.14 0.34.11 0.31.25 0.28.181.40d 0.23.130.23a
Tattered 0.6% (14) 0.1% (2) 1.4% (20) 2.7% (32) 0% (0)
Fine 23.9% (535) 40.6% (749) 44.9% (625) 46.7% (563) 57.6% (414)
Superior 31.2% (700) 12.4% (228) 2.7% (37) 6.8% (82) 3.5% (25)
Exceptional 41.5% (930) 43.1% (796) 48.4% (674) 38.3% (462) 37.1% (267)
Masterwork 2.3% (51) 3.5% (65) 2.4% (34) 5.4% (65) 0.8% (6)
Unknown 12 6 3 2 7
Total 2242 1846 1393 1206 719
Rating 82.5 out of 100 79.3 out of 100 77.6 out of 100 75.6 out of 100 73.6 out of 100
Masterwork
Tattered 61.6% (173)
Fine 28.5% (80)
Superior 6% (17)
Exceptional 3.6% (10)
Masterwork 0% (0)
Unknown 1
Total 281
Rating 26.2 out of 100


Shortcut:
DF:Q

Ratings[edit]

In order to rate articles, click the "rate" tab when on the page you wish to rank, then fill out the form in order to suggest an appropriate rating. If you feel the suggested rating is incorrect, you may override it and force a specific rating.

There are 5 official ratings (plus an additional "unknown" for any manually applied ratings which do not match), all described below.

Unknown[edit]

Unknown Quality Articles have been tagged with a quality level not recognized by the wiki, whether accidentally (incorrect spelling or capitalization) or intentionally (to request that somebody else rate the article).

If you encounter these, please evaluate and rate them according to the criteria below. Note that in some cases, a page may get an error when attempting to give them a proper rating, such as a "template loop" error.

Tattered[edit]

Tattered Quality Articles have many of the following characteristics:

  • May be a stub article
  • Lacks information
  • Contains inaccurate information
  • Is not categorized

This rating should only be used for articles that strictly need improvement. For example, pages for creatures, vermin, or stone types should not be rated as Tattered unless they are missing key components: infobox, description (creatures/vermin only), raws, and navigation box.

Fine[edit]

Fine Quality Articles have many of the following characteristics:

  • Has a substantial number of redlinks, very few links or no links at all
  • Contains little to no inaccurate information
  • Contains some information that needs to be verified

Pages which are entirely auto-generated from the raws should be rated Fine.

Superior[edit]

Superior Quality Articles have most of the following characteristics:

  • No important information is missing (includes templates/infoboxes, obvious facts, etc.)
    • May be missing some less-important information
  • Has a sufficient number of links
  • Has very few red links
  • Includes all standard templates
    • Templates are completed when necessary (including butchering returns for creatures, labors for workshops, etc.)
  • Is properly categorized

Exceptional[edit]

Exceptional Quality Articles have ALL of the following characteristics:

  • Is properly categorized
  • Has a decent amount of information (is "complete" for the purposes of new players looking for information)
  • Has all appropriate templates
  • DOES NOT have any pink text at the bottom of the Article Version template (these indicate some kind of problem; for details, view the Template:ArticleVersion page)
  • Is properly/sufficiently linked to other articles
  • Contains no inaccurate information, but may have a small amount of information that needs to be completely verified.
  • Has multiple editors

Masterwork[edit]

Masterwork Quality Articles are the best of the best. We do not expect all articles to reach this quality; in fact, the guidelines for this quality are set so that most articles are actually incapable of ever reaching this high mark. Masterwork quality articles have ALL of the following characteristics:

  • Covers an important "must-read" topic
  • Is comprehensive on the subject
  • Contains no unverified information
  • Has an appropriate number of outbound links
  • No redlinks are present
  • Article is aesthetically pleasing
  • Is properly categorized
  • Has multiple editors
Retrieved from "https://dwarffortresswiki.org/index.php?title=Dwarf_Fortress_Wiki:Quality&oldid=293305"