- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "v0.31 Talk:Helmet snake"
(→Unreliable advice?: new section) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
The article describes the dangers of helmet snakes in significant detail, as well as providing advice on how to use them against enemies, but helmet snakes '''don't actually exist''' because they lack the [LARGE_ROAMING] token in their raws, so all of this advice seems rather suspect. --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 15:53, 15 September 2010 (UTC) | The article describes the dangers of helmet snakes in significant detail, as well as providing advice on how to use them against enemies, but helmet snakes '''don't actually exist''' because they lack the [LARGE_ROAMING] token in their raws, so all of this advice seems rather suspect. --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 15:53, 15 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :The way I see it, it's possible that somebody added the necessary tokens to the raws to make helmet snakes exist specifically so they could spade helmet snakes. Still not really viable advice all things considered. | ||
Revision as of 21:51, 15 September 2010
"Eating the poison itself, counterintuitively, is also perfectly safe, due to the way the game handles poisons." This could make more sense than it seems. The poison causes necrotosis, therefore would require to be in the muscle tissue or bloodstream. The dwarven digestive system could contain an acid strong enough to dissolve the poison, or the mucous lining of the stomach and digestive tract could be strong enough to repel the poison. And yes. I am starting a disscussion over dwarven anatomy. --Libelnon 10:03, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- Since we're being pedantic, why not point out that even though it makes a certain amount of sense, once thought about, the fact that "eating the poison... is perfectly safe" is still counterintuitive, as one's intuition would be to keep it out of contact with one's critters entirely. BAM! You got logic'd! --Zombiejustice 11:47, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, but then you get snake charmers who drink snake venom quite often with no ill effects. In fact, it's apparently a good source of protein. --Libelnon 14:57, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
- Since we're being pedantic, why not point out that even though it makes a certain amount of sense, once thought about, the fact that "eating the poison... is perfectly safe" is still counterintuitive, as one's intuition would be to keep it out of contact with one's critters entirely. BAM! You got logic'd! --Zombiejustice 11:47, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Unreliable advice?
The article describes the dangers of helmet snakes in significant detail, as well as providing advice on how to use them against enemies, but helmet snakes don't actually exist because they lack the [LARGE_ROAMING] token in their raws, so all of this advice seems rather suspect. --Quietust 15:53, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
- The way I see it, it's possible that somebody added the necessary tokens to the raws to make helmet snakes exist specifically so they could spade helmet snakes. Still not really viable advice all things considered.