v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "40d Talk:Defense guide"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
Strangething (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:: This seems pretty thorough at the moment, more comprehensive than the [[Siege]] page. --[[User:Jellyfishgreen|Jellyfishgreen]] 15:31, 1 January 2009 (EST) | :: This seems pretty thorough at the moment, more comprehensive than the [[Siege]] page. --[[User:Jellyfishgreen|Jellyfishgreen]] 15:31, 1 January 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::It is a general guide and index page. Note the link to [[megabeast]] in the example you quote. Maybe some of the sub-headers could be replaced with bullet lists. --[[User:Strangething|Strangething]] 21:33, 7 January 2009 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 02:33, 8 January 2009
Could do with a rewrite
Looking this over quickly, it seems pretty crap. Too many headings, too little info. e.g.
- # 2.8 Megabeasts
- A megabeast appears alone, with an alert message that mentions the beast by name. These creature are quite powerful. Approach with caution.
Wow! That's helpful!
I would say that this article could be more of an index page, there are plenty of other articles that have been written on each aspect. The article itself should focus on:
- Fortress design (link to Fortress defense)
- Dwarf behaviour (link to Help! My civilians keep running into combat!)
- Traps and using traps
- Military (link to Military)
- Hostile creatures
- Aftermath (cleaning up)
--Juckto 19:25, 8 November 2008 (EST)
- This seems pretty thorough at the moment, more comprehensive than the Siege page. --Jellyfishgreen 15:31, 1 January 2009 (EST)
- It is a general guide and index page. Note the link to megabeast in the example you quote. Maybe some of the sub-headers could be replaced with bullet lists. --Strangething 21:33, 7 January 2009 (EST)