v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
  • v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
  • Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.

Difference between revisions of "v0.34 Talk:Miner"

From Dwarf Fortress Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "==Timelessness== My understanding of {{rule|T}} seems to correspond more with HiEv than Timrem. HiEv removed a reference to 34.08 when the current version became 34.09, but Timre...")
 
m (Forgot signature)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Timelessness==
 
==Timelessness==
My understanding of {{rule|T}} seems to correspond more with HiEv than Timrem. HiEv removed a reference to 34.08 when the current version became 34.09, but Timrem reverted that change, stating that DF2012 needs to cover 34.01 through the present release, which trumps timelessness. Is this the general consensus? I thought that whenever a new version came out, whether it be major or minor, references to previous versions should be removed or updated. The article version template states which version the page refers to, so users have an indicator that changes may have occurred if they are playing an older version, while the [[release information]] page contains the changelogs. I just think that we should be striving to keep the wiki as up-to-date as possible and not have to worry about making distinctions between various versions.
+
My understanding of {{rule|T}} seems to correspond more with HiEv than Timrem. HiEv removed a reference to 34.08 when the current version became 34.09, but Timrem reverted that change, stating that DF2012 needs to cover 34.01 through the present release, which trumps timelessness. Is this the general consensus? I thought that whenever a new version came out, whether it be major or minor, references to previous versions should be removed or updated. The article version template states which version the page refers to, so users have an indicator that changes may have occurred if they are playing an older version, while the [[release information]] page contains the changelogs. I just think that we should be striving to keep the wiki as up-to-date as possible and not have to worry about making distinctions between various versions. --[[User:Cali|Cali]] 02:32, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:32, 19 May 2012

Timelessness

My understanding of Rule T seems to correspond more with HiEv than Timrem. HiEv removed a reference to 34.08 when the current version became 34.09, but Timrem reverted that change, stating that DF2012 needs to cover 34.01 through the present release, which trumps timelessness. Is this the general consensus? I thought that whenever a new version came out, whether it be major or minor, references to previous versions should be removed or updated. The article version template states which version the page refers to, so users have an indicator that changes may have occurred if they are playing an older version, while the release information page contains the changelogs. I just think that we should be striving to keep the wiki as up-to-date as possible and not have to worry about making distinctions between various versions. --Cali 02:32, 19 May 2012 (UTC)