- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "v0.31 Talk:Cave spider"
Mason11987 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
::Thanks. Obviously being two miles long isn't a criteria; there is certainly value in being concise. Any nea votes? [[User:Minus|Minus]] 04:00, 12 May 2010 (UTC) | ::Thanks. Obviously being two miles long isn't a criteria; there is certainly value in being concise. Any nea votes? [[User:Minus|Minus]] 04:00, 12 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
::A .GIF screenshot would be preferable. --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 04:22, 12 May 2010 (UTC) | ::A .GIF screenshot would be preferable. --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 04:22, 12 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::Good idea, but I have no objection to bumping the quality. [[User:Mason11987|Mason]] <sup>([[User talk:Mason11987|T]]-[[Special:Contributions/Mason11987|C]])</sup> 06:36, 12 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 06:36, 12 May 2010
Wouldn't separating your spider habitat from your cats via doors marked as impassable for pets do the trick , while leaving your cats free to clean up other vermin from your fort? Oddtwang of Dork 09:08, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- The problem with that is that eventually a dwarf will pass through the door and the cat that is desperately trying to get in will have a small window to do so.--Kuroneko 12:24, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
If cats are annoying in real life as they are in DF, I want all of them dead. Even Scamps. And the article is wrong - you can't chain or cage cats that are pets of some crazy cat lady. 22:42, 28 April 2010 (UTC)~
- This looks fixed. Thanks. Minus 00:56, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Venomous?
Is there a good page that redlink should go to? I may just be blind but I haven't found a comprehensive page explaining the poison system in DF2010 yet.
- This looks fixed. Thanks. Minus 00:56, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Masterwork Quality
Is there any reason this page should not be considered masterwork? It seems rather comprehensive given the fact that the topic is a rather mundane vermin. Perhaps adding a small screenshot depicting the webs? Minus 01:06, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- Well I think it has more or less all you need to know about them, including how to deal with them and what they're good/bad for. It also respects every criteria of the quality post so why not. I'm fetching a screenshot right now. --Speed112 01:10, 12 May 2010 (UTC)