- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "v0.31:Exploratory mining"
m (Rule G) |
|||
(15 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | Once you've had enough | + | Once you've had enough [[Losing|fun]] to have a basic fortress working, it becomes necessary to dig down in search of ores, gems, water, etc. Exploratory mining attempts to dig out as little as possible in order to see as much as is possible, using clever digging patterns. |
{{av}}{{Quality|Exceptional}} | {{av}}{{Quality|Exceptional}} | ||
== Goals == | == Goals == | ||
− | Minerals are quite common (as of v0.31.01), reducing the need for extensive exploratory mining to find raw materials. Instead, the goal of most exploratory mining will be finding special features like | + | Minerals are quite common (as of v0.31.01), reducing the need for extensive exploratory mining to find raw materials. Instead, the goal of most exploratory mining will be finding special features like [[Caverns]] and [[Magma]]. |
One might want to dig down to the caverns to find drinkable water, if the surface is all saltwater or winter-frozen ponds. | One might want to dig down to the caverns to find drinkable water, if the surface is all saltwater or winter-frozen ponds. | ||
== Dangers == | == Dangers == | ||
Potential dangers include: | Potential dangers include: | ||
− | * | + | *Hostile creatures which inhabit underground areas |
− | * | + | *Large pools of liquids ([[Water]], [[Magma]]) |
− | * | + | *[[Hidden Fun Stuff|Fun]] |
− | |||
==Strategies== | ==Strategies== | ||
Line 48: | Line 47: | ||
* ''Target'': Any size. Clusters as small as a single tile are revealed. | * ''Target'': Any size. Clusters as small as a single tile are revealed. | ||
* ''Visibility'': '''100%'''. | * ''Visibility'': '''100%'''. | ||
− | * ''Reusability'': Very low. The long corridors aren't very useful, and can only be expanded to long, wide corridors. | + | * ''Reusability'': Very low. The long corridors aren't very useful, and can only be expanded to long, wide corridors. with the right use of walls you can make plenty of 3x3 rooms. |
− | * ''Bottom line'': Easy to designate, and a single miner will focus on one tunnel to the end or they take a | + | * ''Bottom line'': Easy to designate, and a single miner will focus on one tunnel to the end or they take a [[break]]. This method achieves the same visibility as hollowing out, but using a mere third of the labor. Ideal for hunting single-tile gems. As an added bonus, it is more efficient than a 3×3 design. |
Larger "tunnel" patterns are suggested to be dug in multiples of "3" to allow for later complete revealing with minimum effort. | Larger "tunnel" patterns are suggested to be dug in multiples of "3" to allow for later complete revealing with minimum effort. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Ladder Rows === | ||
+ | <div style="font-family: monospace; white-space: pre; line-height: 126.5%"><nowiki>░░░░░░░░░░░░ | ||
+ | ░░░░░░░░░░░░ | ||
+ | ░░░░.░░░░░.░ | ||
+ | .░..░..░..░. | ||
+ | ░.░░░░░.░░░░ | ||
+ | ░░░░░░░░░░░░ | ||
+ | ░░░░.░░░░░.░ | ||
+ | .░..░..░..░. | ||
+ | ░.░░░░░.░░░░ | ||
+ | </nowiki></div> | ||
+ | * ''Labor'': 25% of the tiles are excavated (1 in 4). | ||
+ | * ''Target'': Any size. Clusters as small as a single tile are revealed. | ||
+ | * ''Visibility'': '''100%'''. | ||
+ | * ''Reusability'': Moderate. Alternating corridors can be mined out to create 5 tile wide rooms of any length... if the extra doors aren't a concern. | ||
+ | * ''Bottom line'': A little more tedious to designate, but the increased re-usability and efficiency make this an attractive alternative. | ||
=== Diagonal every 5 === | === Diagonal every 5 === | ||
Line 81: | Line 97: | ||
* ''Bottom line'': You'll need to clear part of one layer to get the shafts started up or down (use one of the other methods to cover the area), but for one shaft at a time this method is, tile for tile, the most efficient for those with 100% visibility, and has a great reuse value. In practice, however, if you have more than one shaft being dug at one time, up/down-mining can cause miners to jump around between shafts, wasting time. | * ''Bottom line'': You'll need to clear part of one layer to get the shafts started up or down (use one of the other methods to cover the area), but for one shaft at a time this method is, tile for tile, the most efficient for those with 100% visibility, and has a great reuse value. In practice, however, if you have more than one shaft being dug at one time, up/down-mining can cause miners to jump around between shafts, wasting time. | ||
− | :It takes a lot of keypressing to designate, although you can save some effort by designating every third row (as in the rows method, except with stairways) and then removing the designations ({{k|d}}-{{k|x}}) on all but every third column. Alternately, [[User:StrawberryBunny/Mineshaft.ahk|here]] is a ahk script to save your fingers. | + | :It takes a lot of keypressing to designate, although you can save some effort by designating every third row (as in the rows method, except with stairways) and then removing the designations ({{k|d}}-{{k|x}}) on all but every third column. Alternately, [[User:StrawberryBunny/Mineshaft.ahk|here]] is a ahk script to save your fingers. Or, you could hold down the left mouse button (designating your staircases) whilst changing Z-levels. You'll still need to do it for each shaft individually, but it can be very time-saving. |
− | ''For a discussion on optimizing travel times through mineshafts, see | + | ''For a discussion on optimizing travel times through mineshafts, see [[Mineshaft stitching]].'' |
=== Diagonal ramps === | === Diagonal ramps === | ||
− | The pattern as shown is 1 up-ramp every 7 tiles vertically, or 1/14 horizontally, though this could be turned 90 degrees. The downramps are shown, but are only designated on the next level down. (Be ''sure'' you know how | + | The pattern as shown is 1 up-ramp every 7 tiles vertically, or 1/14 horizontally, though this could be turned 90 degrees. The downramps are shown, but are only designated on the next level down. (Be ''sure'' you know how [[ramp]]s work before trying this one!) |
<div style="font-family: monospace; white-space: pre; line-height: 126.5%"><nowiki>░░▼░░░░░░░░░░▲░░▼░░░░░░░░░░▲ | <div style="font-family: monospace; white-space: pre; line-height: 126.5%"><nowiki>░░▼░░░░░░░░░░▲░░▼░░░░░░░░░░▲ | ||
Line 97: | Line 113: | ||
░░░▲░░▼░░░░░░░░░░▲░░▼░░░░░░░ | ░░░▲░░▼░░░░░░░░░░▲░░▼░░░░░░░ | ||
░░▼░░░░░░░░░░▲░░▼░░░░░░░░░░▲</nowiki></div> | ░░▼░░░░░░░░░░▲░░▼░░░░░░░░░░▲</nowiki></div> | ||
− | * ''Labor'': | + | * ''Labor'': 14.3% of the tiles are excavated (1/7). |
* ''Target'': Any size. Clusters as small as a single tile are revealed. | * ''Target'': Any size. Clusters as small as a single tile are revealed. | ||
* ''Visibility'': '''100%'''. | * ''Visibility'': '''100%'''. | ||
− | * ''Reusability'': Moderate. 3x3 spaces cannot be created until at least one up-ramp is removed or a down-ramp floored over. | + | * ''Reusability'': Moderate. 3x3 spaces cannot be created until at least one up-ramp is removed or a down-ramp floored over. [[Ramp]]s are less convenient than stairs for many purposes (for example, digging out the wrong tiles around a ramp can make it unusable). |
* ''Bottom line'': In some ways the most efficient method of all, but difficult to designate and somewhat inconvenient (especially around the edges of the map). Awkward to stitch together. | * ''Bottom line'': In some ways the most efficient method of all, but difficult to designate and somewhat inconvenient (especially around the edges of the map). Awkward to stitch together. | ||
Line 163: | Line 179: | ||
* ''Visibility'': 87/256 (34%) of the tiles are visible. | * ''Visibility'': 87/256 (34%) of the tiles are visible. | ||
* ''Reusability'': High. A 15×15 block of solid rock is extremely versatile when it comes to interior design. It's easily converted into a 7×7 block design, which may be further converted into a 3×3 block design. | * ''Reusability'': High. A 15×15 block of solid rock is extremely versatile when it comes to interior design. It's easily converted into a 7×7 block design, which may be further converted into a 3×3 block design. | ||
− | * ''Bottom line'': This method is preferable when you are low on labor. It can easily accommodate parts of your fort, or serve as the precursor for a more thorough search. A 12×12 or 18×18 version are also valid options, with obvious dis | + | * ''Bottom line'': This method is preferable when you are low on labor. It can easily accommodate parts of your fort, or serve as the precursor for a more thorough search. A 12×12 or 18×18 version are also valid options, with obvious (dis)advantages. |
=== Mine Shafts on a 6-, 9-, 12-, or 15-grid === | === Mine Shafts on a 6-, 9-, 12-, or 15-grid === | ||
Line 184: | Line 200: | ||
▓▓▓▓▓░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░▓▓▓▓ | ▓▓▓▓▓░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░▓▓▓▓ | ||
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓</nowiki></div> | ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓</nowiki></div> | ||
− | * ''Labor'': from under 3% (1/36) for the 6-grid to less than 0.5% for the 15 grid (1/225). | + | * ''Labor'': from under 3% (1/36) for the 6-grid to less than 0.5% for the 15-grid (1/225). |
* ''Target'': Large clusters and up (as above) and underground features. | * ''Target'': Large clusters and up (as above) and underground features. | ||
− | * ''Visibility'': | + | * ''Visibility'': from 25% for the 6-grid to 4% for the 15-grid. |
* ''Reusability'': High. Any area often needs a set of stairs (or more than one) leading up/down, and these would be the start of them. | * ''Reusability'': High. Any area often needs a set of stairs (or more than one) leading up/down, and these would be the start of them. | ||
− | * ''Bottom line'': This method should be used when you are looking for | + | * ''Bottom line'': This method should be used when you are looking for [[caverns]], or getting a feel for the various rock layers, or just hoping to get lucky with little effort. Grids larger than 15 may start to miss even large features such as large clusters, but can be used for identifying stone layers, and can always be filled back in later with shafts on a tighter grid. |
With any grid pattern, a (much) wider version could be used to start and to locate specific stone layers/areas, and then filled in later in a tighter pattern where you want if you're not lucky the first pass. If you plan to use the 3-grid pattern (for a 100% tile reveal) later, create your grid with intervals that are a multiple of "3". If you are only looking for veins, features or just don't care, then do as you will and play it by ear later. | With any grid pattern, a (much) wider version could be used to start and to locate specific stone layers/areas, and then filled in later in a tighter pattern where you want if you're not lucky the first pass. If you plan to use the 3-grid pattern (for a 100% tile reveal) later, create your grid with intervals that are a multiple of "3". If you are only looking for veins, features or just don't care, then do as you will and play it by ear later. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | == Mountain Top Removal Excavation == | ||
+ | When the fortress is large enough, nearly every dwarf is standing idle, you have plenty of picks, and just want to mine it all ([[Elf|Environmentalist Hippies]] can go to HFS!), complete excavation may be in order. The risk of cave-in or stranded dwarves prevents simply designating an entire mountain Channel, but mining the whole thing can be done with minimum player effort. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Designate up-down stairs on the entire area to excavate, on every z-level. Designate the lowest level up-stairs, and leave a single tile one z-level above undesignated. | ||
+ | * Let the dwarves mine it. | ||
+ | * If any walls are attached to the outermost edge of the excavation area, designate all of the edge stairs Channel to remove them (dwarves will mine them from the neighboring stairs). | ||
+ | * Designate the lowest z-level for Remove Up Stairs. Leave one to prevent cave-in! | ||
+ | * Build a support under the unmined tile (remember step #1?). Remove the last up stair, once everyone is out of the stairs above. | ||
+ | * Link a lever far away, keep away all the <strike>suicidal idiots</strike> dwarves and pull it. | ||
+ | |||
+ | After a long wait, the entire block of stairs will collapse, leaving the entire area safely excavated. The lever can now be removed, and all goodies from an entire mountain can be collected. | ||
+ | ---- | ||
{{Category|Guides}} | {{Category|Guides}} |
Latest revision as of 16:31, 26 July 2021
Once you've had enough fun to have a basic fortress working, it becomes necessary to dig down in search of ores, gems, water, etc. Exploratory mining attempts to dig out as little as possible in order to see as much as is possible, using clever digging patterns.
This article is about an older version of DF. |
Goals[edit]
Minerals are quite common (as of v0.31.01), reducing the need for extensive exploratory mining to find raw materials. Instead, the goal of most exploratory mining will be finding special features like Caverns and Magma. One might want to dig down to the caverns to find drinkable water, if the surface is all saltwater or winter-frozen ponds.
Dangers[edit]
Potential dangers include:
Strategies[edit]
All of the interesting stuff is below you when you start - digging straight down may be the fastest (though not the safest) way to find points of interest.
Those interested in *safely* exploring the depths may wish to create a level every so often where the stairway is broken so you can create barriers (like doors or lever-controlled floodgates) or garrison military squads to deal with any discovered hostiles.
Exploratory Patterns[edit]
Patterns are represented by a unit tile. This unit tile is repeated throughout the area intended for excavation to create the desired pattern. Each pattern is analyzed with the above factors in mind.
Key: . = Mined (floor) x = Mined (shaft) ░ = Visible, not mined (wall) ▓ = Not mined, not visible
Hollow[edit]
All tiles are excavated.
- Labor: 100% of the tiles are excavated.
- Target: Any size. If it exists in the layer, it will be found.
- Visibility: 100% of the tiles are visible, obviously.
- Reusability: Approaches zero, except for mass storage. Any design other than a large hall requires reconstruction.
- Bottom line: Easy to designate, but miners tend to be a bit chaotic in their approach to the task. Hollowing wastes labor like there's no tomorrow, but integrates extraction into the exploratory mining process. Use only if you have a lot of labor to spare, or need huge amounts of stone and don't mind the reconstruction required to make the hollow area habitable.
Rows[edit]
- Labor: 1 per every 3 tiles (~33%) of the tiles are excavated.
- Target: Any size. Clusters as small as a single tile are revealed.
- Visibility: 100%.
- Reusability: Very low. The long corridors aren't very useful, and can only be expanded to long, wide corridors. with the right use of walls you can make plenty of 3x3 rooms.
- Bottom line: Easy to designate, and a single miner will focus on one tunnel to the end or they take a break. This method achieves the same visibility as hollowing out, but using a mere third of the labor. Ideal for hunting single-tile gems. As an added bonus, it is more efficient than a 3×3 design.
Larger "tunnel" patterns are suggested to be dug in multiples of "3" to allow for later complete revealing with minimum effort.
Ladder Rows[edit]
- Labor: 25% of the tiles are excavated (1 in 4).
- Target: Any size. Clusters as small as a single tile are revealed.
- Visibility: 100%.
- Reusability: Moderate. Alternating corridors can be mined out to create 5 tile wide rooms of any length... if the extra doors aren't a concern.
- Bottom line: A little more tedious to designate, but the increased re-usability and efficiency make this an attractive alternative.
Diagonal every 5[edit]
- Labor: 20% of the tiles are excavated (1 per 5).
- Target: Any size. Clusters as small as a single tile are revealed.
- Visibility: 100%.
- Reusability: With a bit of imagination you can build nice 3x3 rooms
- Bottom line: This method is moderately efficient among those with 100% visibility. This one doesn't use other levels to move from one spot to another but is annoying to designate.
A variation would put diagonals every 10 or 20, laying the groundwork to fill them in later for higher visibility if desired.
Mine shafts, grid of every 3 tiles[edit]
- Labor: 11.1% of the tiles are excavated (1/9).
- Target: Any size. Clusters as small as a single tile are revealed.
- Visibility: 100%.
- Reusability: It's easy to make into square rooms of various sizes, the stairways can be removed and used as doorways, or just carved out as part of the rooms.
- Bottom line: You'll need to clear part of one layer to get the shafts started up or down (use one of the other methods to cover the area), but for one shaft at a time this method is, tile for tile, the most efficient for those with 100% visibility, and has a great reuse value. In practice, however, if you have more than one shaft being dug at one time, up/down-mining can cause miners to jump around between shafts, wasting time.
- It takes a lot of keypressing to designate, although you can save some effort by designating every third row (as in the rows method, except with stairways) and then removing the designations (d-x) on all but every third column. Alternately, here is a ahk script to save your fingers. Or, you could hold down the left mouse button (designating your staircases) whilst changing Z-levels. You'll still need to do it for each shaft individually, but it can be very time-saving.
For a discussion on optimizing travel times through mineshafts, see Mineshaft stitching.
Diagonal ramps[edit]
The pattern as shown is 1 up-ramp every 7 tiles vertically, or 1/14 horizontally, though this could be turned 90 degrees. The downramps are shown, but are only designated on the next level down. (Be sure you know how ramps work before trying this one!)
- Labor: 14.3% of the tiles are excavated (1/7).
- Target: Any size. Clusters as small as a single tile are revealed.
- Visibility: 100%.
- Reusability: Moderate. 3x3 spaces cannot be created until at least one up-ramp is removed or a down-ramp floored over. Ramps are less convenient than stairs for many purposes (for example, digging out the wrong tiles around a ramp can make it unusable).
- Bottom line: In some ways the most efficient method of all, but difficult to designate and somewhat inconvenient (especially around the edges of the map). Awkward to stitch together.
Pinwheel Shafts[edit]
- Labor: In this example about 17.3% of the tiles are being excavated.
- Target: All except single-tile targets are guaranteed to be found, and those will only rarely be missed.
- Visibility: 96.6%.
- Reusability: Workshops can be easily fitted into the unmined 3x3 areas.
- Bottom line: Very similar to Mine Shafts, but you can replace the up/down stairways with alternating up stairs and down stairs on different levels, eliminating the chance that one of your dwarves will slip and fall all the way down the shaft to their deaths.
7×7 blocks[edit]
- Labor: 15/64 (~23%) of the tiles are excavated.
- Target: Veins and up, as the large 5X5 space left in each unit tile can easily conceal a small cluster. Small clusters will be found perhaps half the time.
- Visibility: 39/64 (~61%) of the tiles are visible.
- Reusability: Medium. The 7×7 blocks can easily be converted into 5×5 rooms, suitable for individual rooms, storage or workshops. Optionally, it can be converted into a grid of connected 7×7 rooms, if you center each room on a crossroad; or similarly into a grid of 3x3 rooms, good for workshops, etc. Easily converted into a more thorough 3×3 block patten by digging through the large blocks.
- Bottom line: This is a low-labor method great for vein-hunting. The low labor cost puts you in a position to invest more and get better coverage if desired.
If you think you may wish to later use the "rows" method (above) for 100% visibility, this could be based on a spacing of 6, 9, or 12. Wider spacing starts to risk missing even veins.
15×15 blocks[edit]
- Labor: 31/256 (~12%) of the tiles are excavated.
- Target: Large clusters are guaranteed, and unless you have particularly bad luck you should also find all veins, but there is no guarantee. Veins would only rarely be hidden in the large 13×13 space left. The large 13×13 space left in each unit tile can easily conceal quite a lot.
- Visibility: 87/256 (34%) of the tiles are visible.
- Reusability: High. A 15×15 block of solid rock is extremely versatile when it comes to interior design. It's easily converted into a 7×7 block design, which may be further converted into a 3×3 block design.
- Bottom line: This method is preferable when you are low on labor. It can easily accommodate parts of your fort, or serve as the precursor for a more thorough search. A 12×12 or 18×18 version are also valid options, with obvious (dis)advantages.
Mine Shafts on a 6-, 9-, 12-, or 15-grid[edit]
- Labor: from under 3% (1/36) for the 6-grid to less than 0.5% for the 15-grid (1/225).
- Target: Large clusters and up (as above) and underground features.
- Visibility: from 25% for the 6-grid to 4% for the 15-grid.
- Reusability: High. Any area often needs a set of stairs (or more than one) leading up/down, and these would be the start of them.
- Bottom line: This method should be used when you are looking for caverns, or getting a feel for the various rock layers, or just hoping to get lucky with little effort. Grids larger than 15 may start to miss even large features such as large clusters, but can be used for identifying stone layers, and can always be filled back in later with shafts on a tighter grid.
With any grid pattern, a (much) wider version could be used to start and to locate specific stone layers/areas, and then filled in later in a tighter pattern where you want if you're not lucky the first pass. If you plan to use the 3-grid pattern (for a 100% tile reveal) later, create your grid with intervals that are a multiple of "3". If you are only looking for veins, features or just don't care, then do as you will and play it by ear later.
Mountain Top Removal Excavation[edit]
When the fortress is large enough, nearly every dwarf is standing idle, you have plenty of picks, and just want to mine it all (Environmentalist Hippies can go to HFS!), complete excavation may be in order. The risk of cave-in or stranded dwarves prevents simply designating an entire mountain Channel, but mining the whole thing can be done with minimum player effort.
- Designate up-down stairs on the entire area to excavate, on every z-level. Designate the lowest level up-stairs, and leave a single tile one z-level above undesignated.
- Let the dwarves mine it.
- If any walls are attached to the outermost edge of the excavation area, designate all of the edge stairs Channel to remove them (dwarves will mine them from the neighboring stairs).
- Designate the lowest z-level for Remove Up Stairs. Leave one to prevent cave-in!
- Build a support under the unmined tile (remember step #1?). Remove the last up stair, once everyone is out of the stairs above.
- Link a lever far away, keep away all the
suicidal idiotsdwarves and pull it.
After a long wait, the entire block of stairs will collapse, leaving the entire area safely excavated. The lever can now be removed, and all goodies from an entire mountain can be collected.