v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Quality"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
OddballJoe (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | |||
+Fine+ is not good for the low Quality, as this is more like ‼XXStubXX‼ than anything better than normal quality --[[User:Rhenaya|Rhenaya]] 20:48, 8 May 2010 (UTC) | +Fine+ is not good for the low Quality, as this is more like ‼XXStubXX‼ than anything better than normal quality --[[User:Rhenaya|Rhenaya]] 20:48, 8 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Should we hold off on this for now? == | == Should we hold off on this for now? == | ||
Do we actually want the quality template visible on every page? It currently links to a page which says there's supposed to be a "Rate" tab, so I'm guessing the system is broken or turned off. Anyway, I think trying to improve quality isn't super useful until most articles have been updated for v50. [[User:OddballJoe|OddballJoe]] ([[User talk:OddballJoe|talk]]) 00:57, 11 January 2023 (UTC) | Do we actually want the quality template visible on every page? It currently links to a page which says there's supposed to be a "Rate" tab, so I'm guessing the system is broken or turned off. Anyway, I think trying to improve quality isn't super useful until most articles have been updated for v50. [[User:OddballJoe|OddballJoe]] ([[User talk:OddballJoe|talk]]) 00:57, 11 January 2023 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Like Oddball said, the template doesn't seem to work as intended. For instance, it doesn't add the category it is supposed to. The categories for the quality ratings exist, but are all empty of pages. [[User:Jerimee|Jerimee]] ([[User talk:Jerimee|talk]]) 04:07, 26 January 2023 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:07, 26 January 2023
+Fine+ is not good for the low Quality, as this is more like ‼XXStubXX‼ than anything better than normal quality --Rhenaya 20:48, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Should we hold off on this for now?
Do we actually want the quality template visible on every page? It currently links to a page which says there's supposed to be a "Rate" tab, so I'm guessing the system is broken or turned off. Anyway, I think trying to improve quality isn't super useful until most articles have been updated for v50. OddballJoe (talk) 00:57, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Like Oddball said, the template doesn't seem to work as intended. For instance, it doesn't add the category it is supposed to. The categories for the quality ratings exist, but are all empty of pages. Jerimee (talk) 04:07, 26 January 2023 (UTC)