v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "v0.31 Talk:Opal"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Since this is a month of the Dwarven calendar as well as a gem, should it have its own stub? For each of the other months, a separate page existed. This includes Moonstone, which is also a gem. To be fair, the {{L|Moonstone}} page is pretty sparse. I'm still too new to know when to create a page and when a convention says not to. --[[User:Hikus|Hikus]] 16:57, 19 August 2010 (UTC) | Since this is a month of the Dwarven calendar as well as a gem, should it have its own stub? For each of the other months, a separate page existed. This includes Moonstone, which is also a gem. To be fair, the {{L|Moonstone}} page is pretty sparse. I'm still too new to know when to create a page and when a convention says not to. --[[User:Hikus|Hikus]] 16:57, 19 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
:This is a tough call because "Opal" is not a specific gem (which would warrant its own page) but a family of gems. An "Opal" page would contain only a list of opals, and the reference to the dwarven calendar. This is probably why a seperate page has not yet been created for it.--[[Special:Contributions/208.81.12.34|208.81.12.34]] 18:57, 19 August 2010 (UTC) | :This is a tough call because "Opal" is not a specific gem (which would warrant its own page) but a family of gems. An "Opal" page would contain only a list of opals, and the reference to the dwarven calendar. This is probably why a seperate page has not yet been created for it.--[[Special:Contributions/208.81.12.34|208.81.12.34]] 18:57, 19 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::40d already had an "Opal" page which simply listed all of the types of opals '''and''' mentioned the calendar month association. Since said information is exactly the same (I was the one who verified all of the gems on {{L|Gem}}), I've copied the page over and reorganized it slightly. --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 23:29, 19 August 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:29, 19 August 2010
Since this is a month of the Dwarven calendar as well as a gem, should it have its own stub? For each of the other months, a separate page existed. This includes Moonstone, which is also a gem. To be fair, the Template:L page is pretty sparse. I'm still too new to know when to create a page and when a convention says not to. --Hikus 16:57, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
- This is a tough call because "Opal" is not a specific gem (which would warrant its own page) but a family of gems. An "Opal" page would contain only a list of opals, and the reference to the dwarven calendar. This is probably why a seperate page has not yet been created for it.--208.81.12.34 18:57, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
- 40d already had an "Opal" page which simply listed all of the types of opals and mentioned the calendar month association. Since said information is exactly the same (I was the one who verified all of the gems on Template:L), I've copied the page over and reorganized it slightly. --Quietust 23:29, 19 August 2010 (UTC)