Dwarf Fortress Wiki talk:Centralized Discussion/Changes to terminology

My own notes were basically already this page, so it seemed reasonable to create it as its own discussion page. Especially as I can foresee this being a recurring, relevant topic, as a result of future updates. The current layout and blurb is just what fell into place, from my own notes on the topic. As with any other wiki page, feel free to update and change it if you think it is warranted. Alpacalypse (talk) 20:50, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Missing or undefined terminology

I'm just going to go ahead and seed this page with some topics of discussion that are referenced on the main page, so they can be referenced there, and it doesn't feel like some form of disembodied voice talking. Not to mention, it is pretty arrogant to have some officious notes/suggestions without putting my name to them. I'll sign each section paragraph rather than the end of the edit, to avoid future confusion over comments. Alpacalypse (talk) 22:58, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

To-do list

This section is for discussion of additions or changes to the (at the moment utterly undemocratic) To-do and specifics list. At the time of writing, I can't think of anything on there that doesn't, objectively, ideally need to be addressed at some point; but that is just my subjective opinion. Alpacalypse (talk) 21:53, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Pages and references

Groups

Currently, there is no group or groups page, which has bothered me for a while. The armies page gives a good summary of the topic, but I feel quite strongly that most players would be far more likely to by searching and thinking or "group" rather than army, if they were looking up, i.e. refugees, migrants and caravans. Not only that, but (outside of dwarf fortress) an army can be defined as a group, but a group can only rarely be described as an army. And just to belabour the point, AFAIK, these terms have never been officially defined in a statement from Toady. Alpacalypse (talk) 21:47, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

References to Name

Should Fortress name and Custom names and symbols be added as sections on name and redirect to there, or should these pages remain separate? I am at a when it comes to naming pages based on hypothetical groupings of these terms. See also Name and Names (categories and disambiguation). Alpacalypse (talk) 21:47, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Categories and disambiguation

Name and Names

The bulk of the main page concerns this topic, so I'm just really owning up to the first edit and leaving this section for anyone else to comment in. Alpacalypse (talk) 21:47, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Group and Groups

See also: Pages -> Groups above. Regardless of the linked section, this seems like a sensible candidate for a category and disambiguation page. I feel certain there are quite a few articles that would make sense to include in this. Alpacalypse (talk) 21:47, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Object Objects and Item Items

I started a talk on the currently empty Objects page. Objects/Items are another word combination that have quite recently taken on specifically different, but not very explicit, meanings.
Don't forget about the modding concept of Objects too, which as far as I can tell, is also missing a clearly defined (at least in specific terminology) description on a wiki page. Alpacalypse (talk) 21:47, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Symbol and Symbols

There is already a Symbol disambiguation page (In this case I used the singular rather than plural, as Symbols are a menu category). As I understand it, a disambiguation page is generally meant to be quite concise, but "symbol/symbol" can mean so many things that are relevant to different aspects of the game. I think there might be room for some further explanation, either on that page, or elsewhere. For example: there are at least three explicitly defined game features using the word "symbol"/"symbols".

Symbols of office
Group symbols
Squad symbols

The first two can both have custom names and descriptions, and the last two are related very closely by name, but not at all by feature. You can see why I think this is a bit of a minefield, even with a disambiguation page. More importantly, for most people reading this page, it could obviously get quite complicated with wiki discussions and editing style consistency, unless there is some sort of referenced explanation or consensus on the use of this word/term. —Now I've written this, I realise that, regarding the latter part, this is probably easily addressed via the Style and consistency section here, and/or the Manual of Style. --Alpacalypse (talk) 18:30, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

I made some changes to the disambig page to follow wikipedia's style. That style is good because it gets to the point quickly without forcing the reader to follow links to understand the differences between different meanings. Also, I think we should consolidate stubs where it makes sense. Symbols (menu) is nothing more than a list of symbol of office, so I think the articles should be merged.—OddballJoe (talk) 18:32, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

I agree; and with your comment here about adding it to a section on the menu page. Menu needs a good rewrite for v50, and new information added, though. I think it would be appropriate to have some form of plain English clarification about the use of the word Object though. - e.g. in the context of the menu/interface, an object is always a type of item, but not all items are objects - as far as the game's menu classifications go. If you look at the Objects menu tabs, the first three are artifact|artifacts, symbols and named objects. All three of these can be separate things, or combinations of them. Probably needs a lot of verification for specifics. I think written items can be both artifacts and named objects too. As you implied, lexicographical nuances are probably a misuse of a disambiguation page. So: clarification in a relevant section of the menu page seems okay for this? Maybe with a 'see also' to raw file objects, for good measure (which I've had trouble finding). Alpacalypse (talk) 01:22, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Plurals

Regarding plurals, I think:

When an average wiki user would reasonably think of a different meaning for the plural, having separate articles is fine (e.g. bar and bars), with a see also on both pages
In other cases, the plural should generally redirect to the singular.

I think things like "symbols", "objects", etc fall under the latter category. I went ahead and redirected Symbols to Symbol, and moved the article about the menu to Symbols (menu). —OddballJoe (talk) 18:28, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Style and consistency

I just noticed I have been subconsciously capitalising terms like "Written content" and "Named objects" because that is how it is presented in the game menus, but in this case, even though technically accurate to what is displayed in-game, I think doing this for names on menu tabs looks weird and inconsistent with most other terms used in the wiki. Just an opinion really, but I thought I'd mention it. I imagine most editors wouldn't take in-game terminology accuracy to this extreme, and besides, they are menu tab titles, not really seen in any other context, so it is probable reasonable to assume they are only capitalised when being used as a title in this way. Alpacalypse (talk) 22:46, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Loosely defined terms

Related to the above note on capitalization. There are some terms that are not clearly defined, in the game, or from the 'word of god'; e.g. "group" (what sort of group?) and "symbol" (of an administrative position (as well as other contexts)). It might be good to have some consensus on regular usage of some of these examples, but I thought I'd comment here first. If someone else doesn't before me, I'll update the main page with a section for suggesting consistent terminology for anything that might regularly need to be mentioned. As an example, I propose, and have already been using: "symbol of office", for a symbol assigned to an admin/noble position. Alpacalypse (talk) 22:58, 10 March 2023 (UTC)